User talk:Pxyvision

August 2008
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of L.M. Meier


The article L.M. Meier has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Biographical article about an academic. The only source is to a blog that does not appear to meet Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources, therefore the article is not verifiable by readers and does not show how the subject is notable. The article clearly violates WP:BLP in its current state.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of L.M. Meier for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L.M. Meier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/L.M. Meier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with L.M. Meier. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Sparthorse (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)