User talk:Py5chari0

March 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Blockchain database, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Overview
 * Help pages

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you Diannaa for the cues. The topic is bit technical, I will try not to copy directly but also I will try not to put something irrelevant. Let me proceed accordingly. Py5chari0 (talk) 02:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Your addition to Blockchain-based database has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sigma Beauty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sigma Beauty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sigma Beauty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Priyanjali singh (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Astral (company) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Astral (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 11:17, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @Onel5969 I appreciate your feedback. As requested, I have gathered a few independent sources that I would like to share with you for your consideration and examination. All the citations mentioned below have been properly utilized in the draft of the article.
 * 1.Section Title:Case Study 2: Astral Poly Technik, Book Title: The Unusual Billionaires, Publisher: Penguin UK
 * 2.Title:Using DuPont Analysis to Assess the Financial Performance of the Selected Companies in the Plastic Industry in India, Journal: GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE REVIEW, ISSN:0921-5077, Publisher: Amsterdam University Press, SCOPUS: Yes
 * Financial research reports prepared by independent analysts, in accordance with WP:LISTED, are accessible and uphold transparency by including appropriate disclaimers and declarations of no conflict of interest.
 * 3.Title: Astral Poly Technik An 'astr'onomical growth story, Publisher:HDFC securities
 * 4.Title: Astral Poly Technik, Financial Analysis, Publisher:Axis Direct
 * 5.Title: Astral Q4FY22 Result Review, Publisher:IDBI Capital
 * Can you do another review soon? Your input is valuable to catch any missed concerns. Thank you for your time. Py5chari0 (talk) 09:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you do another review soon? Your input is valuable to catch any missed concerns. Thank you for your time. Py5chari0 (talk) 09:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)