User talk:PyotrRossetti

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Striegl


A tag has been placed on Mark Striegl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Mark Striegl. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MickyShy (talk) 05:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Striegl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Striegl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mark Striegl& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Cassiopeia  talk  20:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Striegl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Jaqueline Cristian
 * added links pointing to WTA and ITF
 * Hu Xuwei
 * added a link pointing to CBC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Filip Misolic


The article Filip Misolic has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 01:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Filip Misolic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Filip Misolic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Filip Misolic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adamtt9 (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mateus Alves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castelo Branco.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Román Andrés Burruchaga


The article Román Andrés Burruchaga has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 11:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicolás Álvarez Varona


The article Nicolás Álvarez Varona has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG. No notable tennis achievements and couldn't find any sourcing to indicate any sense of notability. Most sources just mentioned him in passing or when reporting tennis scores."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 19:55, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

I have not removed the proposed deletion, I hope that is something you may be willing to do, but I have added a couple sources which do not simply mention him in passing.PyotrRossetti (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tomáš Sklenárik


A tag has been placed on Tomáš Sklenárik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Digiuserca (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jo-Wilfried Tsonga career statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Blake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sean Cuenin


The article Sean Cuenin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Any sources I found were just recent quick mentions of his involvement in French Open qualifying. No main ATP-level appearances or successes and was not selected for a main draw wildcard into the French Open."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Gasquet career statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Blake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Lorenzo Minh Casali for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lorenzo Minh Casali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Minh Casali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Star  Mississippi  14:17, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)