User talk:PyramidX

November 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mars, Incorporated. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Apollo 12, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Apollo 12 was changed by PyramidX (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955571 on 2016-11-18T01:16:15+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Refutation of Apollo 11 on the basis of the fuel balance for the start and flight trajectory X for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Refutation of Apollo 11 on the basis of the fuel balance for the start and flight trajectory X is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Refutation of Apollo 11 on the basis of the fuel balance for the start and flight trajectory X until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Refutation of Apollo 11 on the basis of the fuel balance for the start and flight trajectory X


A tag has been placed on Talk:Refutation of Apollo 11 on the basis of the fuel balance for the start and flight trajectory X requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RIP Dreams


A tag has been placed on RIP Dreams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Refutation of Apollo 11 on the basis of the fuel balance for the start and flight trajectory X


A tag has been placed on Refutation of Apollo 11 on the basis of the fuel balance for the start and flight trajectory X requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Greg London. KNHaw (talk) 01:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)