User talk:Pythias3183


 * }

I have just been looking at your contributions and have a number of comments. First, I should say that I am a member of the RSA, but that I am currently in UK and do have time to do much research. Now to your contributions. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Meredith Doig should be moved to Articles for creation/Meredith Doig. It should not be a talk page. More importantly I think I have seen the exact words that you wrote somewhere else introducing Meredith. If I am right your new article is a copyright violation and it can not be moved into article space. You have to write in your own words but using and referencing sources. While Meredith is a worthy person I am not sure she is notable (in the wikipedia definition of notable) to have an article now. Maybe in future. I have removed the first header from Rationalist Society of Australia. Articles start with a lead paragraph not a header. Again it seems to me that some of the material your have added might be copied exactly from some source and thus be a copyright violation. Is that correct? It also needs referencing. I suggest you read the guidelines and policies referenced in my welcome above. You can reply to me here as your talk page is now on my watchlist. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  08:19, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I have had time to look in detail at your edits to Rationalist Society of Australia. They are almost entirely and probably totally entirely a copyright violation as a direct copy from the RSA web site. That is not how we write wikipedia, so I have reverted the article back to before you started editing it. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  12:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Meredith Doig concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Meredith Doig, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Meredith Doig


Hello Pythias3183. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Meredith Doig".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)