User talk:Pzez/sandbox

Good day, I am explaining the situation in case Copyright problem: www.approvedcasino.com, the new page creation -- Gambling in Nigeria --. I am the owner and writer of the text on www.approvedcasino.com. It means there is not the copyright violiation. I will send the detailed email on permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org with printscreen whois. The next point, yes I must learn and improve in editing and creating the new page I will read the guideline and improved the layout and the content of the page. Yesterday I just started and still working on the material.

Sincerely Pavel Zezulka

update: I sent two emails /first one my own words plus printscreen ownership domain name www.approvedcasino.com/, second time I used the official copyright template.

To: permissions-en@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I Pavel Zezulka, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media as shown here: www.approvedcasino.com and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Pavel Zezulka Copyright holder date: 08.10.2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pzez (talk • contribs) 08:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status
, is correct CC-BY-SA 4.0 is not a compatible license for text on the English Wikipedia. See WP:Compatible license. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey there, only saw this by chance - didn't get a notification. I have started a discussion on the template's talk page because it seemed odd to include an incompatible license for text. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You're not alone. Adam9007 (talk) 23:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Got the ping that time. Seems to be working after applying Tony's suggested fix. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright release re-sent
The copyright release was re-sent and released under CC-BY-SA-3.0, an acceptable license for text contributions. Would it be possible to undelete the revdel'd revisions? Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If it can't be used under GFDL, does that mean we can't use it? Am I reading FAQ/Copyright right? Adam9007 (talk) 02:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I belive we can use it, hence the existence of Template:CCBYSASource and all articles it is placed on. (t) Josve05a  (c) 02:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The old revisons though needs to stay deleted, since they did not include any attribution, and therefore are in violation of the cc-by-sa license. (t) Josve05a  (c) 02:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That template says" . Adam9007 (talk) 02:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * CCBYSASource also mentions CC-BY-SA-4.0 in the documentation.... that should be removed, correct? Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:20, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, and we do allow such texts, as long as it is specifically mentioned that the article is not under GFDL. See Category:Articles with imported Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 text. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 02:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Wrong. It says CC-BY (not CC-BY-SA), which is okay, even version 4.0, according to the faq. Adam9007 (talk) 02:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, nevermind. I cannot seem to read properly tonight :) Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * So does the faq need updating? There seems to be a contradiction here. Adam9007 (talk) 02:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)