User talk:Pzzp

Titanium
Hi, pzzp - welcome, again. I've moved your comments from my talk page to the discussion at Featured article review/Titanium. (Titanium is currently a featured article, undergoing a review to determine if it still meets featured article criteria. Sandy (Talk) 18:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BobbiMartin ForTheLoveOfHim.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BobbiMartin ForTheLoveOfHim.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Fastily. The image is illustrative of the artist's work. As I don't actually have a copy of the record I'm unable to say who the graphic artist was. Delete it if need be. Pzzp (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Styx
Actually I didn't even know about your edit at all, I just removed metal from Styx's infobox. But anyway that edit of yours would fall under the category of original research which is against wikipedia policy. Take care. Rockgenre (talk) 23:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Riegal / Rigel
Thanks for finding that ref at The Use of Ashes. As a Tom Rapp fan, I'd been looking for some information on the Riegal (Rigel) for nearly 40 years!! I'm very grateful that I can now find out the truth behind one of my favourite songs. Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Peter Green
That's quite alright. Read WP:PEACOCK and WP:SYN. The other things you mention were sourced. The extrapolation of that into "widely acclaimed as one of the most accomplished and influential guitarists of his time." was unsourced and added nothing to the article. Following the guidelines will get you further than sarcasm. Bretonbanquet (talk) 02:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * There wouldn't be anything wrong with a general sentence backing up what the article says, as long as that sentence is sourced. Contentious information has to be sourced, whether it generalises or not. Your latest edit is a very poor choice of words - "almost mythical"? Using a badly written source is unencyclopedic. The follow-up paragraphs explained Green's reputation perfectly well without a pseudo-journalistic exaggeration in the opening paragraph. Green himself would hate it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

More information needed about File:NanWynn.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NanWynn.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Nan Wynn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheeling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Nan Wynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Kingston, Johnstown, Newburgh, Barry Wood and Is Everybody Happy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sonny Dunham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Jordan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Gwen Bari
Not sure if I should have moved the draft when I did, or if the reviewer was to move it at some point. Anyway, 'tis done, and advice is welcome, if any.

Titanium Featured article review
I have nominated Titanium for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  20:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)