User talk:Q28/1

April fools
Just a reminder that april fools jokes are not allowed in the mainspace. Fram (talk) 10:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Fram, so how do I create an April Fools related XfD page? This is the first time I've participated in an April Fools' Day event at enwiki, so there may be some mistakes. Q28 (talk) 10:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * See April Fools for all information and rules. Fram (talk) 10:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @Fram Well, in fact, April Fool's Day have passed, but I will abide by these rules in the next April Fool's Day. Q28 (talk) 03:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The other person hasn't replied to my message for a month, and I think he's already read it, so I file it to archive.archive now Q28 (talk) 01:20, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Self nominations at Editor of the Week
Please do not take the rejection of your self-nomination to heart. In no way is it a rejection of you as an editor or as a member of the Wikipedia community of editors. Continue your efforts. Your ability to create this is an example of someone with the skills to develop into a quality editor. BTW, since the example was not created by a Editor of the Week clerk it will soon be undone. &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   18:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Buster7 Oh, thank you. Thank you for your kind reminder. Q28 (talk) 03:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The other party hasn't replied to me for a month. I assume he has read it, so file it.archive now Q28 (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

"The Boy Bands Have Won, and All the Copyists and the Tribute Bands and the TV Talent Show Producers Have Won" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Boy Bands Have Won, and All the Copyists and the Tribute Bands and the TV Talent Show Producers Have Won and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Well, there is no consensussl so it been kept. archive now Q28 (talk) 01:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Q28,

This is to let you know that File:Yawning Infant, August 2018.jpg, a featured picture you nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for November 20, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-11-20. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 02:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ahecht Thank you for creating it, actually you let found that in fact, November 20th is also Children's Day, I just messed it all up. Q28 (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I think this topic can stop here.archive now--Q28 (talk) 03:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

"$ $" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect $ $ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a page that redirect to emoji. However, because the target page did not mention it, the page was deleted. Q28 (talk) 03:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * It's a shame and pity. but anyway, It's time to archive.archive now Q28 (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Case change redirects
Please stop creating redirects such as Dwen and Love me. It is unnecessary to create redirects that change the case of whatever letter in the target article. The software doesn't care if you type dWeN, dweN, DWEn, etc. While those are redlinks, if you put any of those combinations into the search box, it automatically takes you to DWEN, making these redirects completely useless. Please stop. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Hammersoft I have pause to create the redirect, I'm sorry to have caused you so much trouble. Q28 (talk) 03:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The other side thanked my editor, I think that beacuse the other side agreed with me. Now that the topic could be closed because it had no more discussion and controversy. archive now Q28 (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:EK" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:EK and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * This page was originally a redirect from a user script. However, due to the low number of people using the user script, the shortcut was removed. Q28 (talk) 03:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, it's a shame and pity. but anyway, It's time to archive.archive now Q28 (talk) 14:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Infant

 * Thank you to everyone! In the future, I will nominate more pictures in order to get points on the future Wikicup. Q28 (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, the rules of the Wikicup didn't allow me to do that, but anyway this can be archived. archive now--Q28 (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Radio Rango
My question is, why did you request the removal of Rango Radio? Isn't the prestigious world festival site not enough? this podcast start in 2013 ana ine of the oldest persian podcast ایمان ابوحمزه (talk) 15:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


 * @ایمان ابوحمزه Read WP:gng for more guidance. Q28 (talk) 02:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The other party has been inactive recently and I think this topic can be archived. archive now Q28 (talk) 06:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Featured article review/Green children of Woolpit/archive1
Q28, I don't understand how you came up with the idea of just copying someone's comments and then starting an FAR with it, but I guess I can understand why you haven't returned to that review despite having started it, and despite having been pinged there. This would be a good time to analyze what you did, admit your mistakes, apologize for the inconvenience which needlessly put a half a dozen editors to work, and then to move on. A lack of communication is not a good thing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, was WikiCup/History/2022/Submissions/Q28 the reason? That's even worse. User:Cwmhiraeth, I reverted the edit five points scored in that submission: this is not a valid way to score. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually it is completely acceptable to start a FAR based on someone else's FAR notice, assuming the problems are still present in the article. Follow-up is expected, however. It's up to the coords to close FARs so I've reverted your edit. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  23:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , actually it's never OK to present someone else's work as your own. This qualifies as disruptive editing of the worst kind. Drmies (talk) 01:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree that it's not ok to directly copy without quotation marks. I have on occasion opened FARs by quoting comments left on the talk page by other editors. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Buidhe and Drmies: I'm sorry about this. I won't use this to open FAR again. Q28 (talk) 03:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * With no reply in two weeks, I think this is the end of the matter.archive now Q28 (talk) 06:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Deprodding of Solar eclipse of April 23, 2191
I have removed the tag from Solar eclipse of April 23, 2191, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! 🪐Kepler-1229b &#124; talk &#124; contribs🪐 19:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * This page has been turned into a redirect as I thought it would be, and because the page is so long, I had to archive the section. archive now Q𝟤𝟪 12:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

"Fu*k" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fu*k and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. HurricaneEdgar   12:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * According to the SK policy, this redirection was finally kept. Ｑ₂₈ (talk) 03:38, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Since the other topics are getting longer, this one is not being discussed, so I'll archive it first. archive now Q𝟤𝟪 03:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC)