User talk:QSquared

hi QSquared, This is Forrest. When I read Task Scheduler article, I'm afraid the information about TaskScheduler 2 is misleading. Till Windows 8, Task Scheduler has been version 1.0. but not 2.0 You can check it over the Help menu > about. Does it make sense? best regards,


 * Actually, I did not create that section of the Windows Task Scheduler Page.
 * That said you are a bit off, but I understand your confusion!
 * Originally Task Scheduler was a stand-alone application, when Microsoft decided to overall the application to version 2.0, they completely we-wrote the functionality as a Component for the Microsoft Management Console (MMC); in doing so they created "Version 1.0" of the MMC's Task Sheduler Component and forgot to change it to 2.0, in essence the 1.0 is a Trivial bug they neglected to fix.
 * See here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb756979.aspx
 *  Except: "The redesigned Task Scheduler 2.0 is installed with Windows Vista® and Windows Server 2008. Task Scheduler 1.0 is installed with the Windows Server 2003 family, Windows XP, and Windows 2000 operating systems."
 * QSquared (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * See here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb756979.aspx
 *  Except: "The redesigned Task Scheduler 2.0 is installed with Windows Vista® and Windows Server 2008. Task Scheduler 1.0 is installed with the Windows Server 2003 family, Windows XP, and Windows 2000 operating systems."
 * QSquared (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * QSquared (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * QSquared (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Hi QSquared.

Today you reverted Manifold (disambiguation) to your preferred version without the courtesy of replying to my comments at Talk:Manifold (disambiguation). We don't conduct debate by edit summary and I find your failure to discuss rude and disruptive. Bring your reasons to the talk page and quote the policy that supports your position, noting particularly that (1) nothing prevents linking from multiple pages - in fact it's encouraged; (2) your Manifold (engineering) page is not a dab page; and (3) we only create sub-pages of dab pages in very limited circumstances - and I've stated those on the talk page that you seem to have bypassed. --RexxS (talk) 03:28, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I didn't actually get a notification of the talk page, however the TOC on Wikipedia (at least used to state) relinking to the same page was of little value.

I actually didn't create the other page, however it listed the normal types of engineering manifolds together and seemed like your page was listing redundant variation, as the basic concept is the same between them, and only the application differs slightly, which is usually not how a DAB works.

Proposed deletion of Schtasks


The article Schtasks has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A manual page for a computer program; violates WP:NOTMANUAL. Does not establish notability and is a re-hash of its sole source, a TechNet article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 08:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)