User talk:Qaqwewew

Blocked for one month - See Sockpuppet investigations/Qaqwewew

 * Comment: I'm pretty familiar with this editor's contributions, and I don't believe that the editor was acting maliciously. If User:Jbarta (who started the sockpuppet investigation) brings up abusive use of multiple accounts, then the block should stand (though perhaps reduced as the editor claims to have not been aware of sockpuppet policy), but otherwise this seems to have been a victimless crime. Furthermore, the similarity in usernames of the most active accounts (User:Qaqwewew and User:Zxcvxxcxcx) lead me to believe that the editor wasn't trying to be sneaky. -M.Nelson (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * PS @Qaqwewew, I suggest that you re-add User:Sandstein's comment to this page that you deleted. Removing another user's comments is heavily frowned upon (see WP:TPO), and Sandstein's comment was completely valid. By not clearly identifying all the accounts you have used, it seems as though you have something to hide. -M.Nelson (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Qaqwewew, you may not remove declined unblock request. I have reverted this. Do it again and you will no longer be able to use this talk page.  Sandstein  19:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Block reset
Because of your clear evasion of your block, I have reset your block. It will end exactly 1 month from now. If you evade your block any further, we will have no choice but to make your block indefinite. Regards, –MuZemike 23:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems Qaqwewew may have evaded their block yet again with Ujmikl. I've already filed an investigation. This suspected sock follows the same behaviour as the previous accounts and was spotted again over at WP:GL/P.  Fallschirmjäger 12:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked
You were warned not to evade your block, but you did anyways. Indefinitely blocked. Please go do something else that is constructive with your time. Regards, –MuZemike 15:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)