User talk:Qaz102

May 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union  ‖ 04:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Doctor (Doctor Who). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel  ‖ 07:16, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Doctor (Doctor Who). Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 12:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 12:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Doctor (Doctor Who). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  13:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit War
Qaz102, your recent editing history at The Doctor (Doctor Who) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please discuss your difference of opinion on the article talk page, do not continually revert other editors. Liz  Read! Talk! 13:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent editing history at The Doctor (Doctor Who) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  13:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and for repeatedly trying to insert your own personal reasoning into a Wikipedia article - please read WP:OR to understand why that is not allowed, and see WP:RS for Wikipedia's requirements for adequate sourcing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)