User talk:Qazwsxcb

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sam Bradford has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sam Bradford was changed by Qazwsxcb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947458 on 2016-04-30T16:29:00+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Kwiatkoski


A tag has been placed on Nick Kwiatkoski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  16:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sam Bradford. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  16:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Chase Jeter for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chase Jeter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chase Jeter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. In veritas (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chase Jeter with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dcirovic (talk) 20:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Glenn Gronkowski


A tag has been placed on Glenn Gronkowski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dan Gronkowski. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dan Gronkowski was changed by Qazwsxcb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95494 on 2016-05-01T01:19:22+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 02:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)