User talk:Qctroll

April 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bishops' High School, Guyana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. creffett (talk) 03:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Are you a member of this institution to be aware of current changes made ? Qctroll (talk) 03:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism, such as on the page Bishops' High School, Guyana. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. —  Newslinger  talk   03:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

If my username was a violation of a guideline why was it accepted to be used as a username initially. The double standard here is evident. Qctroll (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

The terms of use specifically state that generally the pages are not monitored for edits yet I was monitored Qctroll (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm also using a VPN and an alias email. I'll be back Qctroll (talk) 03:37, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * See Special:AbuseLog/26491020 and m:Terms of Use. —  Newslinger  talk   07:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. —  Newslinger  talk   07:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)