User talk:Qdogquinn

It appears that you are the previous user User talk:AudioSparx. You left a post on my page in regards to your Audiosparx article, citing another article (Sounddogs) in defense of why your article should stay. I've posted a Request for Deletion on the Sounddogs article, and am posting an RFD on your article (instead of Speedy Deletion) to allow discussion. I've responded to you on my talk page as well. Autocracy 18:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, the Sounddogs article lived on. Please reply to me on my talk page if you're still working to have an Audiosparx article up, and I'll see what we can do for collecting approrpiate sources and writing the article in the correct tone. -- Auto ( talk / contribs ) 14:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Article Recreation
I did not delete the article in question, nor do I personally have any sort of direct control. My suggestion is to take the info from my talk page and post it as a deletion review. See WP:DRV. Autocracy 23:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Sounddogs
This article was never discussed by the community, or approved by an administrator, because it was proposed for deletion and then the proposal was removed. This can be done by anyone. At that point, it would have needed to go to articles for deletion in order to have its own discussion. Please do not refer to Sounddogs as an article that "administrators chose not to delete" or "has the community approval" because this is not true. It went through 1 of our deletion processes and was not deleted, but its existence does not amount to approval.  Leebo  T / C  19:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)