User talk:Qedarite

November 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Unification of Saudi Arabia, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:King Ali listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Draft:King Ali. Since you had some involvement with the Draft:King Ali redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pinkbeast (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Nableezy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Arabs have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Replacing what the cited source says is dishonest, please cease from doing so  nableezy  - 05:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC) 05:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Unification of Saudi Arabia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  nableezy  - 05:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC) 05:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Socking with an IP address does not relieve you of the edit-warring issue. Please do not do that.  nableezy  - 16:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for sockpuppetry and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I did not find a single contribution of yours which was constructive, but there are some which are borderline, and I give you the benefit of the doubt. If you continue disruptive editing after the block expires, an indefinite block is imminent.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)