User talk:Qhxar

March 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to History of the Falkland Islands, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Egsan Bacon (talk) 13:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I gave a valid reason. The "fact" presented there is false and the source is clearly biased. I suggest you read the comment I made regarding the edit. Qhxar (talk) 13:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Your reason was that the sentence was sourced to an article from The New York Times. The New York Times is considered a reliable source - in fact, it's a newspaper of record. That you personally think The New York Times is obviously biased does not affect that. The consensus at the article is also clearly against you, as four different editors have reverted this change over the past week. You should have done what the editor that reverted you on May 6 told you to do if you want to persist in this. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, I don't particularly care for what is considered a "reliable source" if its telling blatant lies. It's talking about a democratically elected leader who founded a party that is still participating in politics as if he was a "dictator". That is clearly biased, whether you would like to admit it or not. Editors reverted the change because the article is in english and that framing favors the british side on the Falklands/Malvinas issue. Wikipedia should have to be a bit more preocupied with neutrality in their telling of history.
 * And I don't know what I "should have done". This is the first time someone has mentioned the edit in question. Qhxar (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)