User talk:Qicboy

Speedy deletion nomination of Laura Lemay


A tag has been placed on Laura Lemay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JFHJr (㊟) 20:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
Although the article has not been speedy-deleted, it is unlikely to be able to be kept as is.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. In the case of an author, this normally consists of substantial reviews. Reader reviews on Amazon don;rt count, or tributes from other authors on the book jackets, of opinion on blogs, or brief mentions in a list; the only thing that counts is substantial published reviews in  publications that are known to be selective and discriminate in its coverage. I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 17:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Laura Lemay for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Lemay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laura Lemay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JFHJr (㊟) 17:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)