User talk:QichenZ

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Wight-Boycott (February 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Wight-Boycott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Nicholas_Wight-Boycott Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nicholas_Wight-Boycott reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I still don't get why anything is not right. Could you please explain it to me as the wording by Wiki is a bit hard to understand? Much appreciated (cause I'm just a beginner). QichenZ (talk) 11:50, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, no problem.
 * The first issue is with notability. We only accept articles that can demonstrate sufficient notability, and in most cases this means that the sources must satisfy the general notability guideline WP:GNG, meaning that you need to cite multiple (3+) secondary sources (newspapers, magazines, TV or radio programmes, books, etc.) that are both reliable and entirely independent of the subject, and that have on their own initiative provided significant coverage (not just passing mentions) of the subject.
 * Ideally articles should be written by only summarising (in your own words, no copypasting!) what such sources have said, citing each source against the information it has provided. This will give you content, referencing, and evidence of notability all at once.
 * In addition to that, articles on living people (WP:BLP) have very strict referencing requirements: every material statement, anything potentially contentious, and all private personal and family details must be clearly supported by inline citations to reliable published sources. This means that as a bare minimum every paragraph should have at least one citation, and also end in a citation; otherwise it is or ends unsupported.
 * Given that your draft references only one source, and cites it only once, this fall far short of the requirements, both in notability and referencing terms.
 * May I ask, where did you get the information in your draft? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Wight-Boycott (February 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Wight-Boycott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Nicholas_Wight-Boycott Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nicholas_Wight-Boycott reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nicholas Wight-Boycott
Hello, QichenZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicholas Wight-Boycott, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)