User talk:Qingxin

Guing'ei
Hi,

It's fine to note that the local pronunciation of Jian'ou is Guing'ei, but please don't link it when it isn't a link, or even a separate concept. Also, there is no such thing as "Chinese-Tibetan" or "Han-Tibetan". I've reverted most of your edits. — kwami (talk) 21:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

WARNING
You are starting to get disruptive. When someone reverts your edits, you need to discuss them. Repeatedly making the same edit is called edit-warring and can get you blocked.

You remove content for no apparent reason. You link to non-existent articles which are merely synonyms of the articles you're editing. You change normal English usage according to your whim. None of this is appropriate. I have reverted almost everything you've done, so this is a big waste of time. Please stop. If you have a problem with an article, say something on the talk page and we can work it out. — kwami (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jian'ou dialect with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Jian'ou dialect with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jian'ou_dialect, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   13:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jian'ou, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GotR Talk 16:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jian'ou, you may be blocked from editing. In other words, please EXPLAIN your edits GotR Talk 07:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jian'ou, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Claiming that the PRC is doing away with prefectural-level divisions MUST be sourced GotR Talk 15:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jian'ou. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GotR Talk 15:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Jian'ou. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Swarm   X 16:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)