User talk:QmunkE/Archive1

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -  BanyanTree 13:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Ainulindalë
References in place. Point out the remaining original research and POV needing cleanup. TKS - black thorn of brethil 03:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind remarks. I have often thought about the synopsis; it is too long and too detailed (more like Cliff's notes than a reference). As for incidences of any unencyclopedic tone you might detect, please do elaborate (specifically, if that is ok - I want to get them right.) TKS - black thorn of brethil 11:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You
Barnstar moved to user page You're welcome, I will still keep helping where I can, i'm just stretched a bit thin at the moment time wise. Death Eater Dan    ( Muahaha ) 17:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi QmunkE! I reverted vandalism to an article Steam (band) that you also reverted today and cleaned up pretty nicely! Keep up the good work! - CalamityJane

Dear QmunkE. You (and RomeoVoid) have both revised/edited a version of the Steam (band) article that is being supported by the editors who supported the article Greg Bravo (Gary Scott). This article indicated that Bravo was the lead singer of "Na Na Hey Hey"; this is a hoax and the supporter(s) (probably only one person who was subsequently blocked for vandalism and personal attacks). The lead singer of the original recordings was Gary DeCarlo (AKA Garrett Scott). The Bravo article was listed for deletion and was deleted yesterday. The related Steam article had been revised to clarify who the lead singer was. It has been reverted several times to a version which is completely unclear on who the lead singer is. It also does not have the references (except for another Billboard book that does not name the lead singer.) My version of the article listed a NY Daily News article from last year as well as a Billboard Book of No. 1 Hits. I believe that anonymous user, Calamity Jane, is yet another attempt to resuscitate the Bravo claim. I have reported this issue to Administration [incidents] because of the situation as well as threats made anonymously related to the article. I am going to revert the article back to an article that clearly states the lead singer of "Na Na Hey Hey". My reasons for wanting this clarified are two-fold: (1) there is this person Bravo who is falsely claiming the song on his own websites and, prior to the deletion, on Wikipedia, and (2) "Na Na Hey Hey" is the only reason "Steam" is notable in terms of an encyclopedia entry and it is important that the musicians be mentioned. Thank you.--Fortheloveofhampsters 22:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry 'bout that...
I dunno, I knew that the UK used the Imperial System before, but I thought the UK reverted to the Metric System. About the toilets: I guess I was talking about the toilets in the Balkans, and the northern part of Italy (specifically Verona. Oh, and two questions about England, or the whole UK, I guess:


 * How's it like driving on the left side of the road? Well, okay, this is a stupid question, since you're probably used to driving on the left side like we're used to driving on the right side, but, I'd just like to know.
 * Now about the Chunnel: do you know how you transition from the left side of the road to the right side (or vice versa) when going from the UK to France (or also vice versa)? The Runescape Junkie 22:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, and of course I count the English as Europeans... Also, I'm probably going to visit London in a year or two, so I'll know these questions, since we're probably going to see the Chunnel. Cheers! The Runescape Junkie 22:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, and thanks for fixing the vandalism. Sorry, I'm a bit slow today, well, tomorrow in the UK. Cheers! The Runescape Junkie 22:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I saw you called what I called the "Chunnel" the "Eurotunnel". So do you call it the former or the latter? I have this excellent road atlas of Europe that labels it the "Eurotunnel", while I read a 1994 National Geographic article about the Channel Tunnel, which said that people nickname it the "Chunnel". I'm baffled. Also, do you see left-hand drive vehicles (with the steering wheels on the left) often in England? Now, I can't drive, since I'm not 16 (the driving age in the US), but I'd just like to know. Sorry I ask too many questions, my mum says I've been like this since I was four. Cheers! The Runescape Junkie 21:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I hope you do well at the University of Southampton! Cheers! The Runescape Junkie 17:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, a few more questions. Sorry, I know you're busy with the University and all. First: what are lorries (I think that's a piece of British English...lol)? And second: I thought that the UK reverted to the Metric System. Is this true?The Runescape Junkie 17:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

re:Reversion to Phyrexia
Hi, you reverted an anon edit to Phyrexia - I have undone this reversion as the sentences which were altered by the edits made no sense as they were written and were grammatically incorrect. I can't see why you reverted them, except possibly the use of the word "loser", which is appropriate for the context. Thanks. QmunkE 06:35, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't fully read the entire entry he placed into the article. And yes, the reason I reverted was the insertion of the word, "loser", which at the time, was the only thing that caught my attention. The word "loser" caught my attention because, quickly scanning through the sentence, it appeared he was calling someone/something a "loser", the more derogatory meaning, which I didn't think was appropriate. Looking back at the edit now, I see his revision was fine. Regards, — Moe Epsilon  16:05 August 20 '06

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Smile


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! I'm giving these messages to everyone I know, and it's not the wrong kind of WikiLove (lol)... Cheers!

Question About a "Long Ago" Subject
Remember that those teerrorists in London who were planning to use explosives in gels and liquids to blow up planes (or something like that). Also, it was banned to carry-on gels and liquids on planes. It was all over the news, if I remember correctly... Anyways, did it impact life in Southhampton (or all of England, for that matter), or did it not impact anything at all? Just wondering, (and take your time to answer, I understand you're busy) cheers! • The RSJ • (Main Hub - Rants) 19:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Heh heh, no problem... Cheers! • The RSJ • (Main Hub - Rants) 21:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

2008-09 in English football
I have removed the prod tag from 2008-09 in English football, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-proded, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Articles for deletion. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! Asp 14:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Football AID 1 October – 8 October
Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week. Ben Thatcher has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Unlinking headings
If you're going to remove a link from a heading, please ensure that the link is present elsewhere in the text. Bluap 13:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 11th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

More Questions about UK
Hey, hope the University is doing you well. Anyways, I might be going to London this summer, because I'm going to see family in Frankfurt. I know you don't live in London, but I think you might know these questions:


 * How do you go through the Eurotunnel? Is it like a normal tunnel, and you just drive through it, or is it something different? Also, I heard passing through the tunnel is €230 or something close to that.
 * How is it to drive in England with a left-hand-drive car? Just curious, because we're likely to be coming with a train to London.

Sorry for asking you questions as if you were a travel agency, I'm likely not going to London, but there's a chance. Thanks for asking these mundane questions - T  h   e   R   S   J  03:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Whoops, I meant answering these questions, not asking. Well, anyway, thanks for answering them - T  h   e   R   S   <font color="LightBlue">J  20:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Beit Hanoun November 2006 incident protection
Since no edits have been made to the discussions for at least two days, would you be in favour of lowering the protection on the article, either to unprotected, or semi-protected and just block edit-warring parties in future? I ask only because I'm not in favour of having pages fully protected for any significant amount of time - it's more harmful in the long run in my opinion - the edit warring is unfortunate, but full protection is completely restrictive and doesn't seem to have helped the situation move forward. As the protecting admin I thought I'd come to you before I went to Requests for page protection. Thanks. QmunkE 15:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Perhaps after a couple more days I'll unprotected. The last time the article was unprotected, editors quickly began edit-warring again. --  tariq abjotu  13:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Template:Otheruses
I don't see any change to the italics and indentation. It still seems to work for me. Where are you seeing this problem? -- Renesis (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:NOT
I'd like to think a sentence or two - along the lines of 'not a reposatory of sports results' - could now be added to WP:NOT. However, I'd rather you - or anyone, really - did this rather than myself, given my invovlement in the AfD's. Robdurbar 16:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Adminship
Oooh, thank you. I have always been too modest to nominate myself for adminship, but if you do so I will gladly accept. Qwghlm 13:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Right, thank you for the nomination. I've filled in my RfA subpage. Do you add it to the main RFA page or do I? I am not sure, it's probably you better do it as you're the nominator. Thanks. Qwghlm 15:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * OK I've added it to WP:RFA. There is one final step for the nominator (subst in an RFA Talk page), which I will leave you to do I see you've done it, cheers. Thank you once again for the nom. Qwghlm 15:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Your bad faith
The page move had nothing to do with "process", it was created by ZakuSage just to harass me. If you don't like where I move it, just delete it. It's redundant anyways. RunedChozo 20:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This very user has continued his actions of vandalism by moving non-article entries of the filing of a sockpuppet case into the article namespace. Something needs to be done about his continued out of line actions. - ZakuSage 20:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, I'm moving the liar's harassment pages into his namespace then. Fair's fair. RunedChozo 20:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism report against RunedChozo
After what he did to his sockpuppet report page, I tried to create a notice Administrator intervention against vandalism but it was marked as only being a comment. Could you please help me to file a report on his vandalism of his actions in moving his sockpuppet report page? I'm tired of this users consistent lies and harassment against me - ZakuSage 20:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

ZakuSage is just lying again, he created a bunch of redirects that confused me, and when I caught it I even fixed my own mistake on the matter as well as apologizing on the report page for my confusion.

I'm tired of his lies and harassment campaign against me. RunedChozo 21:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No such thing happened. Please help me deal with this user, he's now stalking the pages I'm editing to try and maintain his ridiculous lies. - ZakuSage 21:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I apologize sincerely for dragging you into this mess. The matter has already been settled, and I will be sure to avoid this user in the future. - ZakuSage 02:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Featured article mistake!
Cheers for removing my Main page request without a fuss! I rushed in a bit and didnt read the instructions fully. Thanks - I will ask for this to be a Featured article first next time! Hoot2 11:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Just wanted to say thank you again for nominating me as an admin, a process which I am glad to say was a successful one. Have a WikiThanks from me. Qwghlm 19:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Flag icon use
Hi, just thought you might be interested in this discussion on flag use (dont know if you've seen it or not, I saw your entry here ) Regards, R. Baley 04:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

"Copyvio"
Can you point to any direct evidence that the link to the documentary film The Great Global Warming Swindle is, in fact, a violation of copyright? It's a pretty tall threat to announce you'll report "anyone who adds it . . . to WP:ANI," especially on pure speculation. ~ UBeR 00:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Great Global Warming Scandal image
Hi there - thanks for the message. Lots of issues within:


 * 1) I recognise the image as I saw the first 10 minutes of the programme in question (before turning off in disgust), and it looks (I think) like the title shot for the programme. So to call it   is definitely wrong, but it is still applicable to the article in question.
 * 2) Furthermore, no image on Wikipedia should be called   as it is obviously can have thousands of possible images.
 * 3) There is an existing DVD cover for this programme.
 * 4) The image is already tagged with nsd so it is likely to be deleted without having to hassle through IfD. That said, it could be given a source tag before it is deleted.
 * So, my recommended option would be to upload the actual DVD cover and include it in the article under fair use. Wait out to see if the existing image is deleted under.
 * 1) If on the other hand consensus is to keep the image, then it should be included under a different name, so reupload it under a new name, and then delete the older version via IfD under the OB (obselescence) rule.

I think that makes sense under current policy. Try going with that now, and do let me know of any resulting IfD debates. Cheers. Qwghlm 00:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

List of victims of Beit Hanoun Incident
Hi Qmunk. Just wondering about your removal of this list. I'm not sure whether it's protocol to post this on your talk page or on the talk page for the article we're discussing, so I'll try here first.

I've noticed that in the articles on quite a few incidents of mass killing the list of victims is included. For example the Kent State Shootings, Bloody Sunday (1972), the Jerusalem bus 2 massacreor the Columbine High School massacre. Something interesting is that all of these are massacres of people in 'Western' 'Developed' or whatever you like to call them, countries. In contrast, massacres of similar numbers (5-30)of people in 'Developing'or 'Third World' countries rarely, if ever, include the victims' names. Sanaa massacre, Hay al Jihad massacre, Wandhama massacre Aguas Blancas massacre to list a few. Maybe I'm reading into this more than it deserves, but your link to the text about Wikipedia not being a memorial is interesting, in particular the second sentence:"Subjects of encyclopedia articles must be notable besides being fondly remembered." Does this mean that citizens of 'developed' nations are necessarily notable, and citizens of 'developing' nations aren't? I don't know the right place to link to in the articles of Wikipedian lore and arcana, but that can't really be the case can it?

Secondly, there is a good source for the list of victims of the Beit Hanoun incident. You have to wade through it but they're all clearly listed there. Again, I didn't notice sources on those massacres with names of victims included. Puddleman 10:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Leading "GB" on the currency
Good point; I hadn't actually noticed that in MOSNUM. Read it too long ago I guess! —  SMcCandlish  &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93; ‹(-¿-)› 02:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Belgarath cover.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Belgarath cover.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reliable sources
You write "The source you are continually using: The Post Chronicle] - is not a reliable source under current guidelines, hence the speedy deletion of its article: . Please stop adding it when other more reliable sources exist which contain the same information (this is in particular regarding your edits to Lindsay Lohan). Thankyou. QmunkE 14:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)"

That is crap.. The Post Chronicle is very reliable and broke the story(like many others) well before the ones cited. The Post Chronicle is not some blog or personal website, it is a corporate news wntity. Your complaint is biased and non sequitur. As a reader and fan of tPC, I'm offended by your generalization. Smokefan2007

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:06, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:06, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

James Milner Career section
Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 04:45, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TGGWS DVD Cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:TGGWS DVD Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)