User talk:QsCarolyn

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Welcome!
Hello, QsCarolyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review Hi!

I think your article is very unique. It seems like more than a few people have edited it thus far and it might be helpful to make the "voice" of the article more cohesive. I think the article is definitely missing some citations, but again, I'm not sure if those were your additions or previous editors'. I think your implementation of links to other wikipedia pages is great and very helpful to the reader, especially someone who is very unfamiliar with the subject.

It might be helpful, visually more than anything, to break up the "adaptations" section and use bullet points for each new adaptation. I also think some more pictures could be added.

Overall, I think your article has some great information and your additions have surely helped lots of wikipedia users!

Aoifemahood (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A-W-R
Hello QsCarolyn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged A-W-R for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TomCat4680 (talk) 00:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

A-W-R
Hi! I know that the class is over, but I wanted to just check in and also give you some notes.


 * With articles, make sure that you have in-line citations. This will help show which claim the citation is verifying. The citations should also specify which page or pages are being cited.


 * There should be sourcing in the article that establishes how A-W-R is notable. This can be things like news coverage, journal articles, or books that are about or mention the collective. Something to keep in mind is that if the source does not mention the collective or is primary (released by the collective or people/organizations/etc affiliated with them), it cannot establish notability.


 * Be very careful of tone. Avoid words or phrases like "desire to" or other marketing type language, as this is seen as non-neutral on Wikipedia.


 * I'm a little confused over the use of the image File:Peony Pavilion （牡丹亭）2.jpg. Was this put on by the collective? If not, then it's better to leave the image out, as it gives off the impression that it's of an A-W-R member.

I hope this helps! I'm really happy to see that you're continuing to edit on Wikipedia! Also, you may want to look into working on this via the Articles for Creation process (WP:AfC). It can take a long while to go through this process, but if you're still working on the article and unsure then this area may be of good assistance. Also, (who is awesome) has expressed an interest in helping you out. Shirt58 is a very active editor that's been on here for a while and I've interacted with them a lot under my main account - he's definitely a wonderful person to work with, so I whole heartedly recommend accepting his help. :) Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)