User talk:Quackquack

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hi, , and welcome to Wikipedia! On behalf of the Wikipedia community, I would like to thank you for your contributions. You're already off to great start. I see a future for you among the throngs of Wikipediholics! If you need assistance with titling new articles, please see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions go to Help or the FAQ. If we've been so inattentive as to not have the answer in any of those places, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Finally, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.

Additional tips
Here are some extra tips to help you get familiar with Wikipedia.
 * For Wikipedia policies and guidelines, see The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and What Wikipedia is not.
 * Find everything in the Directory.
 * If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you.
 * If you wish, introduce yourself at the new user log.
 * If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Tasks in the Community Portal.
 * If you want to attributes edits to yourself from before you established an account, try this.
 * Always remember to Upload Images with the correct Copyright tags.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;). This will automatically produce your name and the date. You can change your signature on your preferences page.
 * Most importantly, be bold!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and I hope to see you around. — Cuivi é  nen , 15:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Roman Catholicism in *
I'm not sure that all of your articles, like Roman Catholicism in The Gambia, are really useful. You might want to check in with the folks at WikiProject Catholicism for some ideas about the best way to present this information. I've brought it up on their talk page here:. Cheers, FreplySpang (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Rushdenshire
I have proposed that the Rushdenshire be deleted because it is a neologism. You may wish to improve the article by addressing the issues raised in the prod notice. If you do not the article is likely to be deleted after 5 days. Gwernol 12:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Axel Maußen"
A page you created, Axel Maußen, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rod Pead
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rod Pead, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Christian Order. Thank you. HrafnTalkStalk 10:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hugh Thwaites


The article Hugh Thwaites has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP, lacking a clear articulation of notability (most likely notability is as an author, but asserts no claims relevant to WP:AUTHOR).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 03:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Quackquack! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Paul Aulagnier -

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Roman Catholicism in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roman Catholicism in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. Since you had some involvement with the Roman Catholicism in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rushden Lakes shopping centre


The article Rushden Lakes shopping centre has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable center"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 21:31, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Rushden Lakes shopping centre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rushden Lakes shopping centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rushden Lakes shopping centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 19:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sedevacantist Heresy


The article Sedevacantist Heresy has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of George Gabet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Gabet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George Gabet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Maximilian775 (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Rafe Heydel-Mankoo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)