User talk:Quakerwildcat

License tagging for Image:Alfonso Soriano.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alfonso Soriano.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 22:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Jim-Dale.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Jim-Dale.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Bill-Bray.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bill-Bray.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion for David shrager
I've added the "prod" template to the article David shrager, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:David shrager. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ardric47 23:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:John-Patterson.jpg listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:John-Patterson.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Image:Alfonso Soriano .jpg marked for speedy deletion
I wanted to let you know that Image:Alfonso Soriano .jpg was marked for speedy deletion because its license is incompatible with Wikipedia. You chose the license cc-by-2.5, but the actual license at the source was cc-by-nd-2.0, which is not allowed here. Mosmof 19:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:David-Shrager.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:David-Shrager.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof 19:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:John Patterson.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:John Patterson.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:John Patterson.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''Duplicate of deleted image Image:John-Patterson.jpg. Deletion summary was Deleting_page_-_reason_was:_"Per_CSD_I3_-_image_has_an_invalid_license"_using_NPWatcher.'''  To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:John Patterson.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Miguel Cabrera.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Miguel Cabrera.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Miguel Cabrera.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''Duplicate of deleted image Image:Miguel-Cabrera.jpg. Deletion summary was CSD_I3__Image_licensed_under_a_Creative_Commons_license_that_specifies_"for_non-commercial_use_only"_or_"no_derivative_works".'''  To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Miguel Cabrera.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pete Orr.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Pete Orr.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Pete Orr.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''Duplicate of deleted image Image:PeteOrr500x333.jpg. Deletion summary was CSD_I3__Image_licensed_under_a_Creative_Commons_license_that_specifies_"for_non-commercial_use_only"_or_"no_derivative_works".'''  To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Pete Orr.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Confirmation
I have emailed the Flickr user behind Quakerwildcat's uploads and have confirmed that the Flickr user is the same person behind this Wikipedia account. Thank you Quakerwildcat for your contributions. Spellcast (talk) 07:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:John Patterson.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:John Patterson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kelly hi! 03:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:John Patterson.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:John Patterson.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC) --The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Pat-Burrell.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pat-Burrell.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

File permission problems
Thanks for uploading File:Ryan-Zimmerman.jpg, File:Bill-Bray.jpg, File:Austin-Kearns.jpg, and File:Jim-Dale.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Royce-clayton-500-333.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Royce-clayton-500-333.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Roy-Oswalt.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Roy-Oswalt.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Discussion regarding ResellerRatings
Your revisions to the ResellerRatings page are not neutral, are not factual, and do a disservice to Wikipedia.

You said, "ResellerRatings originally solicited reviews with the goal of selling the data for profit; but beginning in 2011, after search engines Google and Bing began displaying ResellerRatings scores on their shopping pages for free, CEO Scott Wainner changed the company's business model to offer an enhanced set of "marketing services" to stores, and required all participating merchants to pay monthly fees ranging up to thousands of dollars per month. “We had to adapt and change,” said Wainner.

This is inaccurate and skewed to maliciously damage ResellerRatings' reputation.

1) ResellerRatings did not originally solicit reviews with the "goal of selling the data for profit".

2) Saying that ResellerRatings charges monthly fees "ranging up to thousands of dollars per month" is inaccurate and libelous. ResellerRatings does not disclose its pricing. Small merchants can subscribe for as little as $29 per month.

When you put things like "marketing services" in quotes, and use language like "ranging up to thousands of dollars", it's clear that you have an agenda here.

It appears that you dislike ResellerRatings and are using Wikipedia to bash it, to fulfill a personal agenda. That's not the spirit of Wikipedia: editing articles with negative, hateful, spiteful agenda, is not helpful and is not accurate. I will continue to veto your inaccurate edit. If you'd like to propose a factual edit, let me know. Otherwise, I'll invoke Wikipedia's dispute resolution and we can have a 3rd party editor decide. Techimo (talk) 00:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

ResellerRatings - Chime in if you can
I'm attempting to include other facets of this business in the article on ResellerRatings. I invite you to participate on Talk:ResellerRatings. As we both know, Techimo is affiliated with the company and shilling all over that page to keep anything which he considers unflattering from appearing. ZeroShadows (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)