User talk:QualitycontrolUS

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Real-time contrast chart, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

Removal of maintenance templates from Real-time contrast chart
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Real-time contrast chart. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Nomination of Real-time contrast chart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Real-time contrast chart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Real-time contrast chart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Alternative forums for Real-time contrast chart
I think your research is intriguing and I'd like to encourage you to consider submitting it to Wikiversity or Google Knol. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 19:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Real-time contrasts chart


A tag has been placed on Real-time contrasts chart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Real-time contrasts chart


The article Real-time contrasts chart has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Citation is from 2012, and has 2 citations in Google Scholar -- not WP:Notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 91.52.6.30 (talk) 07:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)