User talk:Quantanew

Welcome to Wikipedia
- 2/0 (cont.) 02:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Boldness
That's fine, I suppose. I opened a discussion on the talk page earlier; feel free to post when you have the time. NW ( Talk ) 17:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Changes to OrbitboxPlanet templates
Hi, I reverted out your addition of a radius column to the OrbitboxPlanet templates. This is a major layout change that affects many articles, and at present the majority of known exoplanets do not have this information. It is probably worth bringing this up at WT:ASTRO before doing these kind of changes. Regards, Icalanise (talk) 23:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

White–Juday warp-field interferometer
Thank you for the response and I apologize if my comments on the article talk page came off like I am shooting the messenger. I too love articles on quantum mechanics and space travel and would love to see a break-through in space travel. I am, however, skeptical of break-through announcements (even from NASA). You used the wording of the secondary online news sources for the article that, in turn, used the press releases from the research group. The news sources should have known better than to repeat the fantastic claims of the group without carefully looking into them. I am tempted to put the article up for deletion however it is perhaps better to leave it to counter the fantastic (and unsupported) claims being made for this device. Aldebaran66 (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Quantanew, can you give me a reference, where did you take tis picture from?

I will be very pleased. Thanks a lot. Niihelium (talk) 18:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HARPS-N, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First light (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paraguayan records in athletics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trujillo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

CTE
I hope you find my work on and around your work in this article OK. Open to discussion; or change (back) as you wish; but I think we were on the same track. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MINiature Exoplanet Radial Velocity Array, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Photometry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Help for Translation
Can you translate this English wiki article "Big Four of Allied power in World War II" to Spanish language and create a Spanish version for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.71.239.141 (talk) 22:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TRAPPIST-1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eccentricity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Florence Griffith Joyner
Quantanew - Nearly two weeks ago, you asked me to discuss an edit to Florence Griffith Joyner on that talk page rather than removing it from the entry. Though I find the edit to be unencyclopedic and virtually indefensible, I complied with your request, but the talk page section has sat undiscussed for all of this time. Are you planning to comment? I see that someone has edited the poor grammar, but I really don't feel like the testosterone information should be there at all without a source connecting it to the subject.

As an additional heads up, I believe you mischaracterized the revert process when you commented in your edit summary "Don't revert before talk". Though there are exceptions, the usual process is known as WP:BRD - bold, revert, discuss. One editor makes a bold edit, another editor reverts it (as I did with good explanation in the edit summary on this article), so the next step would be discussion (not another revert like yours). I started the discussion after your revert, so I hope that you'll choose to participate. EricEnfermero (Talk) 03:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Kepler-20g) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Kepler-20g, Quantanew!

Wikipedia editor Neonorange just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Well formatted; how about crediting the discovery and adding the method. :Neonorange"

To reply, leave a comment on Neonorange's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Harold G. White
Hi, the reason why I removed your recent edits is that the claim of FTL travel being possible is a pretty huge one, and requires lots of realiable sources to back it up. The Washington post article was not related (it was speculation, and published before the experiments were performed). The other two are non-peer reviewed presentations. Let's wait for the peer review. Smite-Meister (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Colossus Telescope for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colossus Telescope is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Colossus Telescope until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChiZeroOne (talk) 15:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Computer shogi
Your recent editing history at Computer shogi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:22, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

File:SABRE ENGINE.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)