User talk:Quantockgoblin/Archive 2006

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! - CobaltBlueTony 20:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Persistent carbene
Hi Quantockgoblin! I see you have taken up the tast to tidy up persistent carbene. Never expected this article to grow this fast. Nice work. But may I ask you to provide an edit summary with every edit you make? It makes it for other editors easier to see what happened, without them having to check the diffs. Thank you, kind regards, Dirk Beetstra T C 06:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Dirk Beetstra

I haven't figured out how to make an edit summary yet, but I will try to do it next time!

QG
 * OK, I'll try and give you some explanation:


 * The edit summary is easy, if you press the edit button on a page, you get a edit box where you can change the text (guess you've done that). Just below the edit box there are three things, a box Edit summary, and two checkboxes (minor edit and watch this page).  Below that you see the three buttons 'save page', 'show preview', and 'show changes'.. guess you found the Save page-button already.
 * On talk pages, you can put some idea's, things you are unsure about, whatever, or just comment on things other people have edited. In the same way you can get someones attention by posting a remark on his/her talk page, the next time s/he refreshes a page while logged in, s/he will get a remark that there is a new message for him/her. By the way, it is common to sign things on the talk page, just type ~, that will be replaced by your name and a date automatically.
 * There are some ways of creating references. The main method is using the format.  When you use the same ref twice, the second time you only have to type (note the / ).  All ref's are then automatically put in the references section (if available, that one should have a  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.
 * This very short article should really just be merged into Manifold. This article describes a type of manifold, not a science of manifold chemistry.  I think that this would be a process of study, instead of a subset of the field of chemistry. - CobaltBlueTony 20:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Image talk:Simple distillation appratus.jpg
See Image talk:Simple distillation appratus.jpg.

Also, did you notice in the pic at the top of the article Fractional distillation, the set-up appears somewhat more primitive than in my pic. That pic was a better candidate to replace than mine. H Padleckas 03:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * H Padleckas I'm not sure what you are asking me - are you suggesting that I should use my simple distillation image to replace the image on Fractional distillation? Regards Quantockgoblin 14:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Vacuum manifold
Almost a year ago, it seemed to me there was little to nothing on vacuum manolds (equipment) in Wikipedia. I've been meaning to write a paragraph or two somewhere in Wikipedia about vacuum manifolds for quite a while, which I finally did. Care to take a look at the last paragraph of Vacuum manifold. I won't have the energy to make a pic for this for quite a while, if ever. H Padleckas 04:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * H Padleckas please see Schlenk line - is this what you are after? Regards Quantockgoblin 14:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Allhin condenser
A tag has been placed on Allhin condenser, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Allhin condenser. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such material. – Tivedshambo (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

"Oomph"-ed chemistry infobox.
I think the periodic table of the elements would be an excellent idea for an image in the background of the infobox header. Are there any images, bar the original Mendeleyev model that look instantly recognisable? JCraw 12:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)