User talk:Quantumobserver/arch2

Reblanked Europartners
Not a problem - I figured you would, being the diligent tagger you be, but just decided to take care of it. Happy editing to you!  Flying  Toaster  06:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I needed to prove a point, my girlfriend left me, and my dog, woofdalf hitler died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.180.83.46 (talk) 05:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello!!!! what is up? im new here have fun editing stuff! Irocksockes1 (talk) 03:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

OK
OK ill make more edits and thank you for the help —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irocksockes1 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.
Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism that was added to my talk page. I owe you one. =) - Eugene Krabs (talk) 21:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Double Thanks
Thanks for reverting that nonsense that Grace Wayne added to my talk page. I appreciate it. :) -- T'Shael  MindMeld  23:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Nyjah Huston
Thanks for the heads on up this; I actually hadn't realized how much vandalism had been done on this article. In fact, the version I reverted to still had some problems. I went back a bit further and restored to an older version which seems to have, if not correct info, info that was put there in good faith. I'll keep an eye on the article for a while to see what happens with it. Thanks again. Rnb (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
It appears we traded reverts with regard to this guy. I appreciate the help with my page. See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  21:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Kevin James
It looks like you realized the same thing I did with the massive vandalism still in the roll back I did to Kevin_James_(actor). I wanted to let you know I reverted it back a couple more manually and I think I caught all of it. Jamesofur (talk) 04:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Israeli cuisine
The edits that I am making to the article on Israeli cuisine are constructive edits - adding information, references and copyeditng. Take a look and you will see. Please don't rollback anything else before talking to me first if you think there is something amiss. Thanks, -- Chefallen (talk) 07:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for correcting so promptly. -- Chefallen (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

NPR.
National Public Radio. u listen to it? cool. u listen to MPBN radio? --Huik01 (talk) 02:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphan tags
Hi, would you please reconsider the insertion of "orphan" tags? First, comments about an article absolutely do not belong on th article itself: that is what talk pages are for. (And no, the placement of such tags is not a "consensus", in any reasonable meaning of the word.) Second, an article that has *one* link to it cannot be considered an "orphan". Third, in a large encyclopedia, most articles will have only one or even zero links to them; that is not a defect — much less a defect that requires tagging. Fourth, please note that massive robot-assisted editing causes thousands of articles to show up on the watchlists of that many editors, and therefore wastes an inordinate fraction of those editors's time (even if only to chack what the edit was). Finally, please note that the insertion of editorial tags (or most any other kind of robot-assisted editing) does not improve Wikipedia at all. It just wastes other people's time and makes articles uglier. All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 22:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

ACC account creation interface access granted
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in as well as the mailing list.

Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day (a day being from 0:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC), although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed". However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.

Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 15:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 05:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Chinese uprising in Mandor, Borneo
I thought first of writing my comments on the talk page. But not everybody who opens a Wikipedia page reads the talk page. I feel that somebody who opens this page should be made aware that what they find here is essentially description by a colonial army of its soldiers' actions against the "Native" rebels, with not one word of the other side's point of view. Of course, what must be done is to locate more material and bring this up to the needed Wikipedia standards. Unfortunately I can't undertake this job right now, and I think the warning should be there on the page itself as long as it is the way it is. Andrew K. Zimmerman (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * ✅ Sorry there, I didn't look into the history. To make a redirect, replace the entire page text with the REDIRECT statement. Best wishes, Quantumobserver (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amjad Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyderabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)