User talk:Quartermaster/Archive 1

Gracias
Thank you for writing the article on the Battle of Chávez Ravine.--Rockero 16:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * ¡De nada! - Quartermaster 14:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Wigwam Motel
Thanks for your article on the Wigwam Motel in Holbrook! It's a neat place that really deserved a good article that explains some of the history. --Nebular110 15:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Elonka
Thank you very much for your support in my RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful, but I still plan to continue with my strong support of the Wikipedia project. Thanks again! --Elonka 07:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Apple II survey
I'm conducting a survey about the Apple II -- any former users are invited to participate. I found you were active on Apple II related articles.

Come to User:Applephreak/survey

Applephreak 18:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Elonka Dunin Change - why not just DO IT rather than delete questioned passage?
See

"Google search order doesn't indicate 'popularity' in the way this sentence is claiming. Be more specific saying it comes up first in a Google search if you want"

I'm mystified as to why you didn't just edit the more correct indication of Google "popularity" as you addressed (and I agree) rather than just delete the reference of "popularity"? Go ahead and do what you propose ("turns up first in Google search") rather than object and delete. Wikipedia allows users to make changes directly. If you don't like something, why not just change it? - Quartermaster 16:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Because, phrased that way, I don't personally find it interesting enough to even warrant inclusion. But if you want to add an uninteresting fact to the article, feel free.  De-mystified now?  —Wknight94 (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * (clarification) Wknight94 (and his pal ) has been stalking me recently, making little sniping edits like this to a variety of articles that are related to me. Diffs and documentation are at User_talk:Elonka. My guess is that Wknight is angry that I called him out in a Naming conventions discussion, where he was talking about using his admin tools to push his own POV, and I pointed out that that would be unethical.  I also repeated back to him his own statement from his RfA, where he himself said that it would be improper for admins to use their tools on articles that they were involved with.  It evidently "stung" him, so he's now got it twisted around his head somehow that my reading of his RfA is "stalking" him, and he's responding by stalking through my own contrib history and other articles related to me.  There's also an indication that he's trying to stick me into a Catch-22:  He's making challenging edits to Elonka-related articles, but if I make any changes, even if just to add a source, I'll get pounced on for WP:AUTO violations.  Wknight, I agree with Quartermaster.  If you want a change made, do it.  If you want a reference on something related to me, ask me for it.  I'll give it to you, you can add it to the article in any way that you want, and life goes on.  Stop with the harassment. --Elonka 18:50, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Your notions of "stalking" and "harassment" and sticking you into a Catch-22 are getting boring. I don't care nearly enough.  I also don't care about your WP:AUTO activity - although I see that's gotten the attention of folks like  at the Foundation.  Go ahead and AUTO away for all I care.  You should both admit here though that my removal of the content at question is completely justified.  If you don't like how I came across it, that's the unfortunate price of making yourself so conspicuous.  But having a statement that gaudy immediately followed by a citation which has no relationship to the statement itself is very inappropriate and should have never been added.  Wikipedia 101. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

POTY 2006
The arrangements for the Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All the featured pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As the creator of one or more images nominated for the election we invite you to participate in the event. Alvesgaspar 12:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

St. Louis Cardinals project
We have a question to be resolved on the Cardinals project talk page. Please contribute to the discussion. Timpcrk87 21:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject St. Louis
Grey Wanderer | Talk 20:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Martin Luther King, Jr.
Thanks for the kind words. As far as adding information to articles, keep in mind the Wikipedia philosophy: Be bold. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 03:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Carney Park
I hope you haven't minded me tinkering with the above while you were creating the article? I'm fascinated to note that such facilities exist. Paste (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit Away!
Glad you're a Carney Park-o-phile. It's an interesting place, anything you can contribute is cool. -- Quartermaster (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the Minor Barnstar! I appreciate that and will display it with pride! --Polylerus (talk) 20:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Bibliography of Philip K. Dick
Thank you for your improvements and expansion to this article. As a librarian, we could really use your help. Please continue your good work or use the talk page to make suggestions for improvement so that others can help. Viriditas (talk) 02:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for voting Keep in my MfD poll. With your help, the debate ended with "no consensus" (although a large majority voted to "keep"). --GHcool (talk) 21:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Seattle history - Thanks!
Thanks for the correction. I responded on my page but wanted to thank you here too. Interesting that redskins.com news release has made the same mistake. []. Regards, ObserverToSee (talk) 17:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

UMSL WP
i've been thinking for a few weeks about starting a wikiproject for UMSL like that for the WashU project. St. Louis articles in general are pretty underdeveloped and I don't want to split the precious pool of editors that are out there. I dunno. If Wash U has one, then UMSL should too, right? Would you be interested? It is mostly nonsense, really. We can edit right now, there's no reason that fancy userboxes and project banners need to even come into play. Tell me your thoughts. DaronDierkes (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I've made a few working groups through the st. louis page. there's one for education.  I'm just going to go through there for now. DaronDierkes (talk) 02:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You may be interested in Category:Libraries in Greater St. Louis. I've put down a rough two sentences of goals for WP St. Louis with regards to libraries at WikiProject St. Louis/Education.  You're welcome to change that.  We could even make a subpage for it if we needed to.  I'm not sure how much there is to cover.  The three main UMSL libraries now have pages though.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability tag
Thanks for your response to my concerns. If it's being actively edited rather than sitting there as a small stub then that satisfies me. Cheers Buckshot06(prof) 22:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

re: Bat-template
Not a problem.

But please, if you've read through what's here, add you comment and why you feel the villain list in the template should be expanded, and to what extent. The idea is to get as many concerned voices as possible in the discussion.

The revert was because the discussion is on going. It isn't considered good form to boldly edit a section that is under discussion.

- J Greb (talk) 01:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Story of the Stone.pg.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Story of the Stone.pg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BJ Talk 07:39, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

McCain
Please see discussion at talk page. Thanks.Ferrylodge (talk) 19:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
All in a day's work! Good to be appreciated! Hiberniantears (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Obama / Rezko edit
Please consider self-reverting this edit, which restored some contentious material inappropriate for the Obama BLP. Your own contributions about Rezko's donations are just as inappropriate as these contributions made by WorkerBee74. The version you reverted eschewed all the contentious material in favor of a straight report of the facts in a neutral tone. Considering your previous edits, I believe you may have made this reversion in error. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. I respect your approach to this article being an honest one. -- Quartermaster (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. :) -- Scjessey (talk) 19:59, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Atlantic Hurricane Magazine (Canadian Magazine)
I, Whenaxis, have enclosed that I no longer want to have this article. I confess this magazine is not suitable for Wikipedia due to its lack of notability. Please feel free to delete the article. Thanks, Whenaxis (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The Rape of the A*P*E*
Anything you can for this article to prevent it being deleted? I've done as much as I can but fundamentally I don't know any good sources to cite from regarding literature. -Rushyo (talk) 00:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

BLP
Hiya, per the Raleigh Muns article, which would you prefer, that information be removed, or that the article be deleted? If you want certain elements removed, please go ahead and delete them directly, or specify which you would like moved. Or if you want the whole article gone, we can do that too, just let us know. --Elonka 20:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd probably prefer the whole article deleted. While the article is/was up, I did learn something interesting; it seems that the Marquis Who's Who in America folks are harvesting wikipedia BLP's. I'm in the current version with word for word from the wikipedia entry. -- Quartermaster (talk) 20:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, I didn't know that. Okay, let me see what I can do... --Elonka 20:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Gone. :) --Elonka 20:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I was surprised when I couldn't find an entry for you (I went back to 2006) so that tells me they're harvesting with some other criteria. When I look at the (now) cached version of the article, I'm in these categories: 1957 births | American librarians | American technology writers | Living people | Washington writers | People from Richland, Washington | United States Navy sailors.


 * And you're currently in these categories: Categories: 1958 births | Alumni of University High School (Los Angeles, California) | American non-fiction writers | Croatian-Americans | Living people | Recreational cryptographers | People from Santa Monica, California | Americans of Polish descent | Puzzle designers | United States Air Force personnel | University of California, Los Angeles alumni  | American video game designers .


 * Does that mean librarians outrank cryptographers in the Who's Who folks' algorithms? Go figure. Thanks for zapping the article. You're a mensch. -- Quartermaster (talk) 20:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's strange. Maybe it was a librarian compiling the list.  ;)  BTW, my mother is in the 2007 edition, but last I checked, it had nothing to do with the Wikipedia bio.  --Elonka 21:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Antonio de Dios
I'll have to contest the speedy deletion of the article "Antonio de Dios". As indicated in the article he is the founder of what is accepted (by a reliable secondary resource) as "the biggest and most successful breeder of exotic birds in the world". He's a well-known person in the aviculture business. So I think a proper tagging would be to ask for more citations (which I'll provide shortly). Best regards. Evren Güldoğan (talk) 10:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Unblock request
I received no notification of this block and have a pretty lily white wiki-record (pretty much). I suspect this is collateral damage from a shared IP or something. I'm mystified especially since I received zilch explanation. Thanks for any assistance in advance.
 * Support unblock request. I see nothing in this user's history to justify an indefinite block. --Elonka 19:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see anything to warrant an indefinite block either. Suggest contacting the blocking admin.— Ѕandahl 20:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * FYI, I used "E-mail this user" for the admin (Slakr) about 30 minutes after the block was applied and haven't heard back yet (coming up on about 2 hours since the block was applied). -- Quartermaster (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * A couple of us have also been posting at User talk:Slakr, without reply. Three established users were blocked indefinitely by Slakr, without explanation. --Elonka 20:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Without some further explanation, I'd support unblocking. – xeno  ( talk ) 20:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Presuming the blocking admin is aware and no reply is forthcoming I'd support an unblock also.— Ѕandahl 20:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going ahead with an unblock, pending any further discussion if needed. Elonka's post at User talk:Slakr appears to be rather insightful, as far as what most likely prompted the block: one of the templates Twinkle calls for speedy notifications was vandalized by Grawp, and slakr's one of the admins pretty active on that front. Looks like an unfortunate misunderstanding of circumstances. – Luna Santin  (talk) 21:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * D'oh. My bad.  Apparently you were caught up in an unfortunate series of template vandalisms.  You evil grawp sock, you ;) ;) ;).  Anyway, sorry again.  Cheers =) -- slakr  \ talk / 21:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. Just want future people considering my RfA (WAY in the future) to realize you ARE joking about me being a Grawp sock. And Grawp was such a cute character, how heinous that his memory has been so defiled. Cheers! -- Quartermaster (talk) 21:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * If grawp spent a year constructively editing, just to throw up a single vandal template, ...well... =) – xeno  ( talk ) 22:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

CSD tagging of Kirk Weddle
Hi. I noticed you tagged Kirk Weddle for speedy deletion as WP:CSD. The criteria say "to avoid speedy deletion an article does not have to prove that its subject is notable, just give a reasonable indication of why it might be notable." I think having taken such a famous photograph qualifies as "indication of why it might be notable" so I've removed the tag. Whether he is in fact notable is another question, of course, and I have no opinion. Let me know if you think I'm in the wrong. Best, Olaf Davis | Talk 23:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * (answer cross posted on User talk:Olaf Davis)
 * I have absolutely no problem with your removal of the Speedy Delete tag from the Weddle entry. I'm a believer in collaborative effort and hope and expect that people with other points of view and expertise won't hesitate to step in and change things I do (well, when done in good faith like this). The whole idea of "notability" isn't exactly written in stone in any case. I tend to leave those arguments to the one's who know best (sometimes it's even me!). You can blame it on me not being a Nirvana fan (I'm more of a Bowie, Sinatra, The Clash, and Freddy Mercury type). Cheers! -- Quartermaster (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Great, I'm glad you feel that way. Sometimes people get a bit offended at their CSD tagging being second-guessed, but I agree absolutely with your sentiments about constructive disagreement. After all, where would Wikipedia be without it? By the way, you seem to have posted your reply twice to my talk instead of once to mine and once to yours, so I'm moving one to yours now as well as cross-posting this message from my talk - hope that's what you intended. best, Olaf Davis | Talk 11:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank You
I'm not sure how to do this otherwise...but thank you for the note on the Frontier League. I'm slowly trying to expand the current team bios, redirecting defunct team pages to their current team locations, etc. Any help or advice you have is greatly appreciated.

Goose300 21:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of New Articles
Would appreciate your input on the instantaneous speedy deletion of articles Offset Paperback Mfrs., Inc. and Pocono Academy Systems, especially in light of the fact that the template tag was used and discussion pages were open for both. Fazul (talk) 15:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Though I tagged those pages with a speedy delete template (specifically, for criterion G11, advertising) the actual deletion of the articles was done by a wikipedia administrator - I am personally unable to delete any pages. In my opinion, the articles were solely about those two companies for the purpose of advertising them. An encyclopedic style would have resulted in slightly longer articles, and cited authoritative third party sources (e.g., newspaper and/or magazine articles) establishing the notability of the companies. Also, based on your user page, you also have to consider the issue of conflict of interest. Since you state that you are the owner of Pocono Academy Systems, and that you were until recently an employee of Offset Paperback Mfrs., Inc. this is an area of concern.  Personally, I've found I'm at my best when I'm creating or editing an article about someone or something in which I have interest, but no conflicts in that interest. Lots of people do edit articles in which they are an interested party, but the best ones disclose their relationship, and work scrupulously on writing a neutral toned description that is appropriately sourced and cited. --Quartermaster (talk) 17:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Interesting. Will keep that in mind for the future. Thank you for taking the time to explain your position. Fazul (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

A Quick Thanks
For your wikilink on Gil Torres. Thank You --KakiBrz (talk) 19:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Spamming Young Trig's page
"Hiya.. you responded to something I wrote on someone else's page by saying the following:
 * Assuming the anonymous IP above indicates that you are Young Trigg in all respect I call bull feces. In addition to the overwhelming and obvious evidence that you are a conflict of interest involved sock puppet, this diff shows an anonymous, and subsequent unprotested and uncommented upon template indicating you are a RETIRED editor . . . who keeps protesting after being "retired." You don't like logging in anymore? PUH LEASE. Just click on the prompt that says "remember me." Please consider going to Conservapedia where your edits will likely be accepted without criticism. Listen. I have the integrity to avoid editing articles on candidates I support and oppose (including this one). Stop deluding yourself that you're "objective" and work on neutral things in your area of expertise, not your area of desire (yes, she's a hot babe). I suggest you do the same. And if you're a campaign operative? Shame on you. --Quartermaster (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to remind you that as an editor your supposed to assume good faith. Spamming someone elses user page by acussing folks like me in the wrong place violates that policy. If you've got a problem with me take it up on my page. You won't look as much like a hothead that way. :) Besides if you follow my ip and edits you'd be able to figure out what names I've gone by in the past and how off your comments were. Ie.. fact check before flying off the handle next time pal. --98.243.129.181 (talk) 22:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I assume good faith when presented by competent evidence and/or criticism. How can I spam an anonymous user's page? Spam? Please clarify. Spam? Spamming someone's user page? Please tell me WHOSE user page, and how one can "spam" a single file/user or anon IP user page? Spam? SPAM is repetition. Please, correct me. I must confess that I consider anonymous IP comments to be cowardice. If you're afraid to identify yourself, even with the mask of a wikipedia account, you are eminently a coward. I can accept bans and blocks and criticism. But I will return as ME, with no artifice. I'm supposed to spend effort to track your accounts and edits down? Why ask someone to "figure out what names I've gone by in the past"? Why not stand behind who you are? Absolute bull feces my friend. You = 98.243.129.181 Me = --Quartermaster (talk) 22:50, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry if I was unclear. You attacked me as an anon editor when I was commenting on somone ELSE's userpage. You called me all sorts of things just like in the post above. Basically I'm saying don't be a jerk. If I want to be anon who are you to judge why? It's like a rorschach test.. your own personality is being exposed as you imagine who I might be and what my motives are. Also, you are posting as anon as anyone else. I'm known by my IP you by Quatermaster. It's not like we're face to face and you're pulling down injustice. So all that opinion of your about you hiding behind your mask applies to you. If you want to comment to me, comment on MY User page, all IPs have a user page and I'll get it. But don't be a prick to me just because you have some half-cocked theory. And in my good faith I'll assume you were trying to take down injustice or had a bad day or something and aren't normally a jerk to random people you meet on the street. BTW, I'm a prof too. Where do you teach? --98.243.129.181 (talk) 23:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I still have to point out how difficult it is to "attack" someone who is anonymous. Who am I to judge that you being anonymous is akin to cowardice? Just one humble wikipedian, no more. Your defensive responses speak loudly. Anyway, my "spamming" (please look up spam) shouldn't bother an anonymous poster much since any perceived attacks can never be attached to the anonymous poster (you) in the first place. Not all people who work in higher education are "professors" (see Conservapedia's article on Obama regarding the appropriate, or inappropriate, use of that title). I have a higher calling - if you check my non-anonymous user profile you'll see that I am a librarian. Don't worry. I don't let my political affiliations affect my service to my constituents. I have supported faculty researchers, with no reservations, who research positions with which I disagree. Note again that I do not engage in edits to articles about current political figures because I recognize my own conflict of interest and biases. Again, I suggest (since the evidence indicates you are a partisan) that you do the same. Engaging me anonymously here is, frankly, pathetic, albeit amusing. How dare I cast aspersions? Once again my aspersions are impersonally against the fungible Internet Protocol (IP) address 98.243.129.181. I am humbly, Quartermaster (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC).

Deletion appeal for 88-keys "Adam's Case File" album
I appreciate the further description of this matter. Information regarding this album was found at an independent website, not the artists MySpace page, personal web site or the record label web page. This is not a collection of songs from various artists randomly created by an unreliable source. This album is produced, performed and copyrighted by 88-Keys and Decon Records. The album is available for digital download and was released to promote the major debut of 88-Keys' album The Death of Adam which will be released on October, 28, 2008, executively produced by Kanye West, which makes it a very legitimate album. Information regarding this mixtape was found at a reputable website which I did reference, and has no ties to the artist in any way. This article was made to promote the effort that 88-keys has put into his work, wherther it be this mixtape, his new album or any previous works produced and performed by him. As it relates to 88-Keys, I created this article to give people an idea about this influencial hip-hop artist and pioneer. If I cannot write an article about his work, with legitimate sources, without it being deleted then what is the point. I believe that if this article is about him, and many other websites are promoting this album, which I have referneced, making it important to the artists history, there should be no conflict of interets. I do not know what else I should do, please advise. If I have to I'll contact the artist and his label for more advice.75.4.137.196 (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

In addition I have added more sources and external links in regards to this album that are not related to the artist, the record label, or any promotional website. This album, although labeled as mixtape by me, is actually a precursor to the artists debut album being released in october. Please advise75.4.137.196 (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/South Korean cultural claims (2nd nomination)
This article relates to Korean influence on Japanese Culture. Korea insists on the origin of the Japanese culture though the Japanese culture received a deep influence of a Chinese culture. And, inconvenient information is deleted by their political campaigns. This text might be profitable to explain of the Japanese and Chinese disliking Korea． This article might be useful for the understanding of the problem of Asia. Still, do you think that you should delete this article? --Eichikiyama (talk) 02:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Seahawks in the NFC--Thanks!
Thank you for the courteous and helpful correction. Having been a Seahawk fan from the beginning, I should have known about the inaugural season being in the NFC...yet somehow I avoided knowing or even suspecting it. Guess it has something to do with having only been seven years old that year. --KevinTMC (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Ed Ruscha
My notes quote 'Heavy Industry Publications' from I Don't Want No Retro Spective', Hickey & Plagens, Hudson Hills Press 1982 p 161. The obvious other place to check is Edward Ruscha Editions, Engberg & Phillpot, Walker Art Center, 1999 vol2, which lists every book he's ever made. I wrote the article after consulting both of these (as listed) Go and check these if you wish. The first edition is very rare-unlikely to have been seen by most people writing about it. Incidentally, I'm not convinced about the box. It seems inappropriate for an artist's book. Way too literal. Franciselliott (talk) 06:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * It is a fascinating field-I'm trying to show a small number of possibilities to do with 20th c books...I personally think that there is a split between Livres d'Artistes and artist's books; in effect one deliberately invokes the natural authority of the book, the other implicitly challenges it. Check out Universal War and Une Semaine du Bonte for definite early sightings; Lettrism seems to be central to post war european production, but has unfortunately been totally forgotten....

My e.mail is foundry.press@virgin.net / apologies if i sounded a bit terse this morning... the response on the Ruscha page is a bit more measured. Books I've done are fairly underground, but include, under foundry and at my own shambolic wbsite  I haven't heard of Warja Honegger-Lavater but will try to check her out. I did an article recently on Takako Saito who also seems to have been airbrushed out of history too. As you might have guessed, I don't consider the difference between books and multiples to be significant. BestestFranciselliott (talk) 16:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Svetla Lubova
Here ya go. Pity she never did anything else.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Enjoy my friend... smile and enjoy.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Alphabetization and collation
I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. -- Wavelength (talk) 06:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Got it
That was kind of strange...! It existed as an empty article, but it's gone now. Doggone, I wish companies would read the rules before they create spam accounts. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Intelleges Deletion
Hey! I just created a page for a company intelleges and it was deleted claiming it was advertising... It is no more and ad than these companies' pages: honeywell ZogSports and walmart. Why was this deleted and the others weren't? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpanoff (talk • contribs) 18:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

New sources
I don't know whether you are watching Articles for deletion/Kuessner effect, but new sources are available. Cheers. --Edcolins (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Lance Stephenson
Lance Stephenson is a real person. I am not making an article for someone that is not notable. If you research him you'll see he is a top high-school basketball palyer-McDonald's all american. He also went to the same high school as NBA players Stephon Marbury and Sebastian Telfair. I'll work on the article.Racingstripes (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
- Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 03:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Ged UK  14:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Altered Speedy Deletion rationale: EmoEarth
Hello Quartermaster, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged (EmoEarth) under a different criteria, because the one you provided was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any queries, please let me know. Thanks again! A le_Jrb talk 21:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

CV Travel
You added an advert tag to CV Travel. Will you please quote which sentences you find to be promotional, so that I can rewrite/remove them? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 04:13, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Mark Twain Award for The Lightning Thief
I've added a ref tag. And, replaced the award back in the table. I agree. It was odd to remove it. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Milliondollarputt.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Milliondollarputt.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

as a psychologyst
You should understand that the article is formed word by word. Not as a whole. I mean the Ghent Tram. Please dont hurry up to delete this article. Because GK tramrunner (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC) GK tramrunner (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I nkow personally the author of Russian Version of a Ghent Tram
 * I also work as a psychology-assistant in a maindsone Foundation / NY

re:Ghent Tram
I'd rather do it in Microsoft Word!
 * Or on a paper... And then I'll put it in WIKI
 * I am so tired of computer dependency. It is real psychiatric disability, when someone want to maki WIKI dirt. Sorry I am such.

Ghent tram
The article is good, because it is word to word translated from Russian Version. GK tramrunner (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * now (12:27 AM Eastern Time) I am going to take a break. Hope you will not kill the article.

WP:PJTF
I want to invite you to join the Percy Jackson task force since you have shown an interest in Percy Jackson related articles. Pmlinediter  Talk 08:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Rosella Sensi
Thanks. Good work. I just made a minor change to "football it up a bit". Juve curr (talk) 17:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

shikiki deletion
i am new to wikipedia, and i agree with you, but i don't know how to put pictures or edit what's like... on the side info, like people do on their pages, but since i'm new, i don't know how to delete it, but if i just leave it, it should be deleted. i will just edit a few things on my YouTube. i agree with your opinion to delete my article.

The Good Dog

A contributor has added a negative opinion on the merits of this book. This seems as if it ought to be allowable, but the comment is incoherent and - well, ain't no near-sighted man can tell it from vandalism. Should it be removed? RLamb (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Diosa Del Mar
Hi - I am adding some photos I took during the salvage operation of Diosa Del Mar's keel. I have "polished" version of the picture that you placed on the page. I was wondering if I emailed you the picture you could submit an editied version, instead of me adding a new picture.

Thanks - The Stroll —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.195.35 (talk) 23:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I was able to upload the edited version.

The Stroll