User talk:QuasiAbstract/Archive3

Fair use rationale for Image:ForeverWarComic.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ForeverWarComic.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for getting in touch
I was just playing with it anyway, i wasn't going to do much reverting with the tool. Im just here to add to my stuff in rail and the NBA and if i see vandalism i will just undo it. In these situations i cant be bothered to write something in the edit summary so having the tool would have saved me from doing that. Its no big deal, thanks for getting in touch Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Captain Planet
About the nonsense reverting thing you're doing: --Bolt (Talk) 14:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * WPCH's schedule - Cpatain Planet is at 7.30 am every Sunday, after JJ on Atlanta
 * TBS' schedule - the series is nowhere in sight.
 * Looks like you like to ruin others' people work. You went around all my articles (well, at least the one I have on my user page... lucky me I din't listed all of them there) putting your unreferenced banner without reason, then you ask one article to be erased (which is fine by me, by the way). Pretty strange form of editing you have, my friend, specially when you take your time to challenge my articles (which are right). Greetings, and excuse my poor English. Bolt (Talk) 17:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for not taking my commentary too seriously. I sometimes use the irony without notiicng it, and that can result offensive to some people. --Bolt (Talk) 12:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Now, really, you hat eme? You proposed Ikki to deletion! I mean, let me breath. I don't care about Challenge or Time Limit, but you're just checking all my contributions just to mark them as incorrect! Oh, by the way, you forgot to put a unreferenced tag on FM Federal. Bolt (Talk) 19:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Ikki article deletion
Considering that I have substantially referenced, and improved Ikki (video game), and you've stated in the AFD "Article has improved greatly (as I hoped it would) since nomination. Notability has improved.." Would you consider withdrawing your nomination for the article? Notwithstanding the need for more English language links, I believe the notability has been clearly established. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * An admin will have to close the discussion. Most likely the decision will be to keep. ~ QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 16:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. Just a note, you can formally withdrawn your nomination if you choose to do so. From wp:afd "If the reasons given in the deletion nomination are later addressed by editing, the nomination should be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an admin. If the nominator fails to do it when you think it should have been done (people can be busy, so WP:AGF on this point), leave a note on the nominator's talk page to draw their attention." AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know if I'm overlooking something (I could be, as I overlooked that information you just gave me), but I haven't been able to find HOW to formally withdraw the nomination. ~ QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 09:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just strike out your original nomination, and make a statement saying the article improvements satisfied your concerns. An admin will close it shortly after that. AtaruMoroboshi (talk) 10:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

link discussion

 * Hiya. =) As someone who's taken an active role in the quality of List of Heroes graphic novels, I thought you might want to chime in one way or another in the discussion about including links to artists and writers.  Whether you think the links are a good idea or not, your input would surely be welcome.  --Centish (talk) 01:37, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk Page
While generally I don't think material on talk pages should be deleted, when that material does not contribute to the discussions and may in fact be injurious to a person, I feel that there is a certain obligation to remove it. What is Wikipedia's policy regarding this kind of thing? Theshibboleth (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You're probably right about it not having been a sincere comment. Still, I kind of question this automatic appending of IP addresses to comments. It seems like the only case where it is helpful is if you have a long discussions with more than one person who does not have a username. Otherwise, it's almost like you're breaching a person's privacy (even though the IP is available in the history). They probably didn't post any sort of signature intentionally, but the bot acts irrespective of their intent. Theshibboleth (talk) 20:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah... maybe there could be some sort of unique identifier linked to an ip address, and maybe only administrators can see the actual ip address... Theshibboleth (talk) 07:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I posted something on the Village Pump. Theshibboleth (talk) 10:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Arkansas Newsletter
-- Chetblong Talk / ARK 02:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Arkanasas newsletter, updated for August
-- Chet B. Long Talk / ARK 04:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Heroes list
It would probably be best. I just didn't want to go to that first. Give them a bit of a chance. Therequiembellishere (talk) 07:35, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, you're probably right there. I don't have the greatest follow-through right now to work on other articles and ask for a semi-protection, so if you could that's be great. Therequiembellishere (talk) 07:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright, thanks and good luck. I already have the page watched in case you need a second voice. Therequiembellishere (talk) 07:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

IDIOT!
GOD DAMNIT! will you idiots learn to at least CHECK THE DAMNED REASONS before REVERTING SHIT????

22:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Highly POV: City of Heroes
I have stated facts about the Mission System as clearly as I could. Is there any more opinion I can remove from what I submitted to note this point, or do you disagree about the repeated look and feel of missions altogether?

Please elaborate. I want to improve this to be able to AT least be mentioned. 209.180.155.14 (talk) 21:07, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I removed all my recent changes, the article is as it was before. Moving on...209.180.155.14 (talk) 21:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Resolved on my IP Talk. Thanks! 209.180.155.14 (talk) 21:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Legendary (video game)
See those at IGN. I can't cite the sources now. Also you are not supposed to remove those information when there is no citation. There is a reason why we have fact tags. --SkyWalker (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The information can be challenged when there is no available information. Do a search on google you will find loads of source. If you don't have the time to add the source how come you have the time to removed and revert it?. People such has you when you remove the information which is verifiable the information can not be brought back unless someone who is dedicated in searching the whole history. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Why it was changed
Because - just like Peter, the acquired ability isn't his base ability, and we are going to avoid over-categorization and speculation. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  13:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ''Actually, they were. Feel free to watch the last few minutes of the episode at NBC.com.'' (GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 16:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Message Restoration on my talk page
I saw your original message before I cleaned my talk page. I always look at my messages, and at random times, I will clean my talk page of old messages. You didn't need to restate your message - I could've always looked at your contribs or my page's history. I have removed it for a second time. Please do not re-add it. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 19:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The Nightmare Before Christmas response
I don't know if there's a result for any Wiki based of the Nightmare Before Christmas projects. Rtkat3 (talk) 9:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * OK. ~ Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 14:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I am merging from other Wikipedia articles only. Merging from Wikipedia articles is not a copy vio.  --A NobodyMy talk 14:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No need to merge, just link and put a short summary under the character ~ Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 14:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, but this article does serve a great navigational function and the nomination is inaccurate, because they do not only appear in 2 games and 1 movie, they also appear in the various Kingdom Hearts games and have been made into many, many toys and other products. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 15:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Then put that information in the nomination. I don't feel that it's any more helpful that the voice cast list on the main page. ~ Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 16:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I cannot edit someone else's post. Why not at worst merge and/or redirect?  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 16:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

<-- I'm not asking you to edit anyon else's post. I'm asking you to add a Keep or Delete at the AfD nomination page and the reason why. Keep in mind that the nomination page is not a vote, but an accumulation of reasons so an administrator may make an informed decision. ~ Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 17:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for clarifying. To be up front with you, it was admitted off-wiki that certain editors show up at AfDs in which I participate to disrupt them.  So, I do not like to comment in AfDs anymore as it had become clear that should I comment in any, it will be disrupted by these other editors.  I have successfully identified a number of sock accounts that are now blocked; however, the individuals behind those accounts occasionally reappear and the main way they do so is to stalk/harass my comments in AfDs.  So, we're all better off if I do not comment in those.  I figure we are best off if I try to improve the articles under discussion and then engage those editors whom I think are reasonable, but were I to say something in the actual discussion, trust me based on extensive past experience others will come along and disrupt it and turn it into a farce.  Whether the article is kept or not, I do not want to see its discussion disrupted.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 18:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Monica Dawson change
I see you've reverted my removal of the speculation on Monica Dawson. I hope you don't mind me asking why? An IP added in a comment regarding Monica & Micah being shown as killed by the villains in an unaired version of Angela's vision. Since it hasn't been aired and without a source, it seems like speculation to me. Cheers -- WORM  MЯOW  14:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * First, the scene did air this season. It was a deleted scene from last season, but it was in on the first two episodes of the third season.  That the mentioned characters were envisioned dead is not speculation, but that the "villains" killed them is speculation.  Even though it was shown that Knox decapitated Claire, we cannot confirm that she actually died.
 * Second, for some reason, I thought you had added that information. So, the reversion to re-add it was accidental, as I was trying to remove it.  My reason makes more sense in the removal than in the addition.  ~ Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 14:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, I know it was there, but they weren't in it. Anyway, no harm, no foul. Cheers for sorting it so quickly! -- WORM  MЯOW  14:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

citations in ender in exile
Hi, you recently put a tag on the Ender in Exile page for more citations. I'm a bit confused as to what I should do and would appreciate some help since I'm still pretty new to making/editing articles for wikipedia. I started a topic int he discussion section of Ender in Exile if you can respond there.

-Jelloshooter (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Taser versus taser
Hi. I noticed that you recently edited Hiro Nakamura, changing the capitalization of "Taser" to "taser". I had capitalized it last week, per Talk:Taser. Is the weapon a non-Taser electroshock weapon? I have not watched the specific episode, but the Taser X26 has been frequently used by agents. If you have no objections, I will capitalize it again. Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 00:08, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * FYI, I went ahead and capitalized Taser again. Flatscan (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

United Nations Exploratory Force
Hi. I've responded on this talk page. Advice would be appreciated.--UNSC Trooper (talk) 13:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Compromise over 'Heroes (TV Series)' page
Hi Auzemandius

I have tried to put some information on the Heroes page regarding its similarities to The 4400, but they are repeatedly taken down. I believe, contrary to your point on removing my edit, that the information added is not simply speculation since the evidence for it is explained. If the information is not speculation, then I am confused as to why the information is removed? I would like to compromise somehow over the issue if possible, rather than the information going up and down from the page like a yo-yo, haha!

Thanks Jambo6c (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Edit
Re: Your Message 'December 2008' I have never said the links were intentional

Thanks Jambo6c (talk) 17:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Edit
Re: 'December 2008' I agree that someone believing it doesn't make it true, but there are similarities there (intentional or not) and that is true. What would you consider to be a trustworthy source?

Thanks Jambo6c (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:AW-RaBrass.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AW-RaBrass.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 23:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Vandalizing Jimmy O'Connor page
You've taken our dispute too far now concerning the Oz Adaptations. Your hostile act on the Jimmy O'Connor page (adding that there weren't any reliable sources sited when various books, news articles and sites are clearly on the page) shows a low level of maturity on your part.Orion2004 (talk) 08:30, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Nirvana2985
...may not be reading your edit summaries. This user is new to wikipedia and probably unfamiliar with how everything works. How about leaving them a note on their talk page explaining why the list of "TAPS family members" is unnecessary? They'd be more likely to see your message that way. Nev1 (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Nitro378
Oh please, original research? It has been commented in dozens of magazines that COD5 is taking a darker tone. Do some research before you try and act all superior with me. PS- I have been on wikipedia for two years. --Nitro378 15:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitro378 (talk • contribs)

Sigh... Yeah, Merry Christmas. --Nitro378 (talk) 18:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rhythm & Brass
A tag has been placed on Rhythm & Brass requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 18:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

BioShock 2
As you will see in the article, I made sure to include the reference right after the subtitle. The information comes from Eurogamer, a reliable source, and is the latest news about the title; as such, this is what we go on. SynergyBlades(talk) 21:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Zimmerman
Oops, so he does. Sorry about that. U-Mos (talk) 09:01, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Please update your status with WP:VG
Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or User WPVG somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
 * Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
 * Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
 * —WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot  03:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Another gentle ping from WP:VG
Dear QuasiAbstract,

You are receiving this message because either [[:Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:
 * Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
 * Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot  22:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

User page redirects
You have a couple of circular redirects in your user page space: These seem to be remnants of your past user name changes, but the content got deleted somewhere along the way. If there is something you want to keep, I can undelete earlier versions of the pages; if not, you should probably add db-u1 to these pages (and their various redirects) so they will be deleted. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 17:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * User:QuasiAbstract/UBX1
 * User:QuasiAbstract/Userboxes/Reading1

---
HAPPY WIKIBIRTHDAY!!! EarthCom1000 (talk) 10:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Heroes (TV series)
Conversion to a task force is proposed and discussed in the talk page. Although I have no interest on the show, feel free. --George Ho (talk) 15:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)