User talk:QuattroBajeena

Invitation to reconsider
I have invited you to reconsider your tag on Malleus's talk page, which i've explained there was uncalled-for, and appeared to assume less good faith than was exhibited by the editor you have criticised. hamiltonstone (talk) 04:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Still not sure how this whole responding to talk page concerns thing works so I'll let you know here too that I responded on Malleus' page.--QuattroBajeena (talk) 05:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Strange you don't know the basics, but you know all about ArbCom, and enough about wikipedia's system of governance to vote on a proposal for its amendment after only 11 edits. Just who do you think you're fooling? --Malleus Fatuorum 12:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've never claimed to know "all about ArbCom", please stop putting words in my mouth. I just read the link to deadminship cases in the CDA navbox and made my own conclusions.  It's a shame you apparently still haven't improved your civility after the concerns raised at your two failed RFAs, Malleus.--QuattroBajeena (talk) 23:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * A shame for who? I often thank my lucky stars that they both failed. How many RfAs have you had under one of your alternate names? --Malleus Fatuorum 23:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Keep digging that hole.--QuattroBajeena (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mattisse/Alerts
Do not alter or remove other editors' comments, please. Do not violate WP:3RR on this or any other page. --Moni3 (talk) 01:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You are blocked indefinitely as an obvious sock. Please find a more constructive way to make your point. -- Andy Walsh  (talk)  01:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I've provided the picture mentioned above in the unblock IRC channel.


 * 1) You deleted the answer to your question, here.
 * 2) Anyone can send a picture of anything anywhere.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 12:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)