User talk:QuebecSierra

This is not a minor change, or a good one. We are free to attribute opinions to critics, but we can't become the critics ourselves. MilesMoney (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, QuebecSierra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Ludwig von Mises Institute does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! – S. Rich (talk) 00:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

October 2013
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Libertarianism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ''This edit clearly violates NPOV. Please do not add your personal commentary to articles. Thank you. '' – S. Rich (talk) 01:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Libertarianism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Are you 12 as your userpage says? Well, please take some time to study the links in the welcome message above. You may not add comments or changes like you did here:. Thank you.'' – S. Rich (talk) 03:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Libertarianism, you may be blocked from editing. – S. Rich (talk) 04:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Srich32977, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – S. Rich (talk) 05:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Michael Chiklis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michael Chiklis was changed by QuebecSierra (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858764 on 2014-01-10T04:22:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Chiklis ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You have made very few edits to Wikipedia, but they have been disruptive from the get-go. I will be asking to have your account blocked if you make any more such disruptive edits. Thank you.'' – S. Rich (talk) 04:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. RL0919 (talk) 00:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)