User talk:Queen I-Wisdom Earth

Welcome!
Hello, Queen I-Wisdom Earth, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Five-Percent Nation, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Best practices for editors with close associations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:05, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Help regarding conflict of interest
I am a member of the Five Percent Nation and my name is Queen I-Wisdom Earth. There is no conflict of interest. There is information on this page that has been confirmed to be wrong based on the nation's own history and procedures with membership. I am an administrator for the Five Percent Nation's media team. It is a duty to correct erroneous information about our collective, to avoid confusion for those who wish to learn about us. This Wikipedia page is filled with an abundance of false information about our teachings and ideology. This has nothing to do with being biased or subjective.Queen I-Wisdom Earth (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You being a member of the organization about which you are editing is definitely a conflict with your being a Wikipedia editor. The interests of your organization and the interests of Wikipedia are what may be in conflict. You should make a disclosure on your user page as described above.
 * Facts in the article must be based on published sources. You are allowed to remove unsourced information, but the best way for you to affect the article is to make edit requests on the article's talk page.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 15:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

The problem is that many of the published sources that are cited on the Wikipedia page are not accurate sources and do not have anything to do, nor have they consulted with actual members of the nation. The information is severely distorted on this page and does not even showcase a neutral understanding of who the Five Percent Nation is. Can you point me to the proper guidance as to exactly how to contribute correction? I do not have any issue with citing published sources that detail such accurate information. Also, please clarify for me, when making such corrections, how does one rather, undisclose their identity.If Wikipedia is striving to be neutral, there should be no reason why an actual member's correction is questioned. Please provide clear guidance on how our media and PR team should move forward.Queen I-Wisdom Earth (talk) 15:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Sources must comply with WP:RS and this excludes PR artciles and texts written by the organization itself. Maybe an answer to your quote: "there should be no reason why an actual member's correction is questioned": members or related people may not have objective views about their connected subject and are as such always questioned. So on such basis (and per WP:CoI rule) don't include PR team and paid promotional media articles. A09090091 (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Please help me understand this. According to Wikipedia:Reliable sources, under News and organizations, there is mention of human interest reporting being considered as "not as a reliable as news source reporting." However, Wikipedia has referenced and cited such to define concepts that the nation realistically does not teach. Explain to me how this is responsible and fair in the light of being neutral? Under "biased or opinionated sources" it says the following, "Common sources of bias include political, financial, religious, philosophical, or other beliefs. Although a source may be biased, it may be reliable in a specific context. When dealing with a potentially biased source, editors should consider whether the source meets the normal requirements for reliable sources, such as editorial control, a reputation for fact-checking, and the level of independence from the topic the source is covering." With such being said, why can't the nation's own publications, websites, books, videos, and any form of original media be used as a source to showcase specific details? Why am I being told otherwise when this is not the case?Queen I-Wisdom Earth (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You may challenge the reliability of a source used in the article. The first place to do this is on the article's talk page. If that does not result in a resolution, you can take the issue to the reliable sources noticeboard WP:RSN. While we would prefer non-primary sources, when no such sources are available we do consider use of publications from the organization as support for statements like "the organization says...". You would still need to request these changes through edit requests on the talk page.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 22:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Help me Thank you for clearing that up.Queen I-Wisdom Earth (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)