User talk:Queenissoawesome

Welcome!

 * }

Nomination of CNR Weird al yankovic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CNR Weird al yankovic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CNR Weird al yankovic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  maucho  eagle   ( c ) 20:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, CNR Weird al yankovic


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, CNR Weird al yankovic. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - CNR (song). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at CNR (song) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  20:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Fish Hooks episodes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of Fish Hooks episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 13:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of Two Weeks for Disruptive Editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 17:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, My babysitter's a vampire (season 2)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, My babysitter's a vampire (season 2). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - My Babysitter's a Vampire (TV series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at My Babysitter's a Vampire (TV series) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.  amuse  (Cindy) 12:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

A Kitten for You!
Thank you, everyone for making me feel welcome! b

Queenissoawesome (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 

July 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JDDJS (talk) 23:47, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of So Random! episodes. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''The episode you added was not supported by the citation used and, in addition, left the article in a damaged state. Please ensure that this does not happen again '' AussieLegend (talk) 00:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hannah Montana (season 3). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Fish Hooks episodes. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 00:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of Good Luck Charlie episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of Mr. Young (USA) episodes


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, List of Mr. Young (USA) episodes. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of Mr. Young episodes. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of Mr. Young episodes - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jusses2 (talk) 02:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Mr. Young, a Canadian television series that airs on YTV, recently sold broadcasting rights to Disney XD so it is now available in the USA (and around the world). The original article, List of Mr. Young episodes, already includes episode summaries and USA air dates. Please concentrate future efforts on improving List of Mr. Young episodes. Thanks! Jusses2 (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The episode summaries that you wrote on List of Mr. Young (USA) episodes are actually quite good. I've merged some of your material over to List of Mr. Young episodes. Jusses2 (talk) 03:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Mr. Belvedere episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:49, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding personal attacks to your long history of disruptive editing and two previous blocks, as you did at User:AussieLegend. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * If someone else did it while logged into this account, that means this account is compromised and we have no way of knowing who we are talking to - and therefore the account cannot be unblocked. Talk page access has now been revoked, so if the genuine owner of the account wants to make any further appeals they will need to contact WP:BASC -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:06, 1 December 2011 (UTC)