User talk:QueensanditsCrazy

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, QueensanditsCrazy. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place help me on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Re: HBO article - trimmed history
As for starting a historical article, I think that could be a compromise (the Nickelodeon and Freeform articles cite precedent for this, plus HBO's history is meaty enough that such a solution would make more sense). Additionally, I'll try to make certain edits to the main body of the history (including condensing info on the development, and maybe rerouting some content on Sterling Manhattan to the Home Box Office, Inc. article), but a middle ground approach would work better as the amount of content removed did inadvertently lead to potential holes in the context. TVTonightOKC (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Definitely spin it off into a new article! I agree with you on the nickelodeon precedent. Good luck, and let me know if you need any help. Thanks! QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

2022 Elections Task Force
Hi QueensanditsCrazy,

I'm looking at starting a task force of Wikipedia editors to work on the pages of candidates up for election in 2022. Many congressional member pages have very few votes or political positions (for example, compare Michelle Steel and Steve Chabot against Nicole Malliotakis), and so I think it would be a great resource for us to flesh out a lot of these pages ahead of the election to better support people who come to Wikipedia for information before they vote.

I see you've been active on a couple of congressperson pages recently so thought you might be interested. If you are, please message me on my talk page. Once I have a couple of interested editors I will work on building a task force page so we can coordinate our work. No worries at all if you're not interested or too busy. Thanks for everything you do for the Wikipedia communtiy!

Wildfire35 (talk) 23:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

G. Vijayaraghavan
Your prod on the article on G. Vijayaraghavan. The article has 7 citations and four of them are Government of India citations. The subject of the article is notable as per WP:ANYBIO. As such, I have removed the tag. Thanks --jojo@nthony (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

ITN for Khader Adnan
Hi, because Khader Adnan is covered by the ARBPIA extended confirmed restriction you need to have 500 edits to comment in the ITN candidate section. Thats why I struck your comment. Feel free to continue commenting in non extended-confirmed restricted topics at ITN.  nableezy  - 21:08, 2 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Oh, I see. Does 4b mean that the restriction applies to even discussion of RD items and others on the main page? QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, and sorry for not asking you on your namespace, I should have done that instead of unstriking. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yep, discussion in the WP namespace is part of it. And no worries.  nableezy  - 12:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Recent death comments
Hi there, you are making statements as part of RD nominations that simply do not make sense. Please note: I hope that is helpful for future RD contributions.  Schwede 66  04:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Certainly notable for RD There is no such thing as a notability requirement for an RD listing other than having an article (and having died). The criterion that needs to be met is that the article is in good shape.
 * A DYK would also be fitting i think Wrong. Please familiarise yourself with DYK criteria at WP:DYKRULES; those are very tight and there is no way that the article under discussion meets any of the three basic criteria.

Regarding your comment on ITN...
The "reply" feature on Wikipedia for whatever reason indents your comment if it has a bullet point for whatever reason. — Knightof  theswords  17:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Ah, thanks. How do I unindent like everyone else? QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, seems to be imbedded in the process. I use the "reply" feature, but I don't bullet my comment, whereas I assume others who do manually edit the page. — Knightof  theswords  01:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)