User talk:QueerEcofeminist/archives1

A page you started (Gondhali) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gondhali, Sureshkhole!

Wikipedia editor Chandan Guha just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for the article. However, it is too short. Please expand it. Cheers."

To reply, leave a comment on Chandan Guha's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Chandan Guha (talk) 03:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Joseph Verbis Lafleur
Hi. The Article entitled Joseph Verbis Lafleur is not a direct copy or directly paraphrased from the page Father Lafleur.org. It was my own construction of story. All those I've written are of personal work. Some may be similar because I need sources to support the story. Ofcourse it may be similar to the page because it is his biography. Where on earth have you even heard of a story of a candidate for sainthood that will tell of two different stories? It would seem foolish to do that since were only talking about a single person. According to philosophy there is that principle of non-contradiction, that one cannot be and and be at the same time, it must be there or here. I do believe that this article I created must not be deleted because it provides informations about Catholic priest from the Military Ordinariate of the United States, who gave his life as a good and exemplary chaplain for his men in the Philippines, and is now in preliminary stages for canonization. In fact, in the Philippines there is a spreading devotion to him since Filipino Catholics are fond of saints and devotions. I want to you to save the page for those people having devotions to him and that you may give considerations for it. I don't know if you are Catholic, I'm not also Catholic, but I have great respect to their faith, and to this person whom they regard as a "Servant of God", which means a candidate for Sainthood. You should know that I met people asking of who Father Lafleur is. Maybe it's time to make an article in Wikipedia about him. In fact we should do this so to satisfy the inquiries of the Catholic and non-Catholics on Father Lafleur. We create articles in Wikipedia to give people easy access on informations on whatever matters. Please do save the page and remove the speedy deletion tag. I beg you for the people willing to know Father Lafleur. Grace be with you (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

WPCleaner 2.0
--NicoV (Talk on frwiki) 12:39, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your Dark Pattern edit
Hello,

Thanks for editing my last entry. I'm a little confused about the best way to handle such cases. It seemed like the right thing to do is provide the full list of dark patterns as well as the definitions of the author. If not, what is the recommended way? To use my own verbiage to explain the pattern?

Thanks! Joe Devon (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Request for help
Hi,

I saw this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Modern_Monetary_Theory&diff=888506920&oldid=888506340

and I ask you how to show that this article:

http://www00.unibg.it/dati/corsi/910003/64338-Warren%20Mosler%20Bergamo%20paper%20March%2010.pdf

is free from copyright. I explain: this article is on the website of University of Bergamo and it is free from copyright.

Thanks. --NUMB3RN7NE (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

, We need a public declaration on the site which says all the contents of this site or parts of it are copyright free/licensed under compatible license acceptable to Wikimedia projects.

But I don't see any such declaration on the university site you mentioned.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 17:11, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi,

I wrote to the professor who held the course (Stefano Lucarelli) and this is his response (in Italian):

''-- Forwarded message - From: Stefano Lucarelli  Date: mar 19 mar 2019 alle ore 18:37 Subject: Re: Stefano scusa una domanda: ma tu sai se questo paper qui è coperto da copyright? http://www00.unibg.it/dati/corsi/910003/64338-Warren%20Mosler%20Bergamo%20paper%20March%2010.pdf

Non è coperto da copyright, è materiale didattico preparato per il corso a Bergamo di cui ero coordinatore. Puoi farlo circolare.''

TRANSLATION (of his answer): "It is not covered by copyright, it is teaching material prepared for the Bergamo course taught by me and of which I was the university coordinator. You can reproduce it."

--NUMB3RN7NE (talk) 17:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Ok I read your answer and I thank you for your patience. I will try to write him and ask if he can insert such a thing on the UniBG website... (I suspect it would not be a thing that can be done immediately, but it would require a bit more time... --NUMB3RN7NE (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 00:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

AfC reviewer and New Page Reviewer bit additionally added
Hi. Apart from adding your account to the AfC reviewers' list, your account has also been added to the " " user group. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Thanks, Lourdes   05:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance. so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

, thanks a lot, I will use these rights wisely and contribute more to the project.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Wei-Wei Te Mousse
Chou Er, Wei-Wei Te Mousse! 2001:D08:DB:C3F4:57B:E729:82B:E1E9 (talk) 16:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Assamese people
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assamese people. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sobibór trial
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sobibór trial. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ainu languages
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ainu languages. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Swedes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Swedes. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donors Trust
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donors Trust. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi QueerEcofeminist! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:03, Thursday, April 11, 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:People's Party of Canada
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:People's Party of Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Republic of China (1912–1949). Legobot (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The World Factbook list of developed countries
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The World Factbook list of developed countries. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Spygate (conspiracy theory by Donald Trump)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Spygate (conspiracy theory by Donald Trump). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:SNC-Lavalin affair. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Civil Rights Act of 1968
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Civil Rights Act of 1968. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian law
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Canadian law. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

ACC tool access request approved
Thank you for your interest in the account creation process. I have verified that you have signed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and approved your request.

You may now access the interface here pending a tool root marking your account as identified in the tool database. Before you begin handling any requests, please ensure you have read and understood the account creation guide and username policy to familiarize yourself with the process.

Please subscribe yourself to the private ACC mailing list by clicking here and following the instructions on the page. I also highly recommend that you join us on IRC. We'll be able to grant you access to our private channel, where a bot informs us when new account requests arrive, and where you can chat with the other members of the team and get real-time input, advice, and assistance with requests and how to handle certain cases that are giving you confusion or trouble.

IMPORTANT: Please note that repeatedly failing to correctly assess and process account requests and take the correct resulting actions will result in suspension of your access to the ACC tool interface. Processing account creation requests is not a race, and each request should be handled with your upmost diligence, care, and attention. Closing each account request correctly, accurately, and within full compliance of the ACC tool guide is your goal and your priority; never sacrifice accuracy and compliance of policy in exchange for quantity, or to close a high number of requests that are in the queue.

ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL: Releasing any kind of personally identifiable information or any kind of non-public data listed in the access to nonpublic personal data policy (such as the IP addresses or email addresses of account creation requests), whether intentionally or unintentionally, is treated as an extremely serious violation of policy and breach of confidential information, and will generally result in immediate suspension of your access to the ACC tool interface. Depending on the severity of the offense, the intent, and the level of misconduct that occurred, the violation and the breach of the confidential information will be reported to the Wikimedia Foundation, which can result in further sanctions and actions being taken against you (such as being blocked, banned, or having your identified status revoked). If you have questions about this, or aren't sure about anything in regards to this policy, please ask a tool administrator.

Your current user rights allow you to create up to six accounts in a 24 hour period. After this limit has been reached, you won't be able to create any more accounts. However, you can still process ACC tool requests without any issues; just place any approved requests back into the queue so that another tool user can perform the account creation step and finish the process for you. You also won't be able to create an account with a similar username to that of another account that exists; these requests are listed in a separate queue on the interface, titled "flagged user needed". However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at Requests for permissions/Account creator after you've demonstrated a few months of experience and proficiency withe processing and handling new account requests.

Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions, and I'll be happy to answer them. Thank you for participating in the account creation process, and we're glad to have you as part of the group! Welcome to the ACC tool user team! :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:20, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I've already subscribed you to the email list using the email address you provided in your ACC tool user request application. If you want to use a different email to subscribe, let me know and I'll be happy to fix that. :-) Welcome to the team!  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, for accepting my request.
 * Yes, I will use the tool with lot of care.
 * Yes, I use the same email ID is had provided in request application, thanks for adding me there.
 * Let me check with the tool and get back to you if I need to know something more or have some issues. thanks for your help  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:17, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You bet! Do you plan on joining us on IRC? Apart from being given access to the ACC private channel, there are many Wikipedia IRC channels that you'll probably find useful to join as well (#wikipedia-en being the main one). I'm on IRC 24/7, and it's great to be able to chat with other editors in real time about Wikipedia and other topics. I highly recommend that you at least give it a chance and see if its something you like. What do you think? Let me know. :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , Sure, How can I connect to acc IRC channel?  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * QueerEcofeminist - I left you some instructions in the IRC conversation we just had. If you get stuck anywhere or if you need any help, please let me know and I'll be happy to help guide you though it. :-) Cheers -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Create article
Please create an article on Hari Mirchi Lal Mirchi Hansi jat (talk) 10:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , you can create a new article if the subject is enough notable for a Wikipedia, please read WP:RS AND WP: NOTABLE BEFORE starting you work again..... please red these two pages carefully before doing anything now.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 12:11, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You are most welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks for breaking the ice and starting it up, I was waiting that we should speak some fine day/night but it did not start. So, yes we did.

Don't you think that Pune guy is not new and incarnation of the old one?  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 04:39, 18 April 2019 (UTC) 
 * You mean this one? I didn't find anything appropriate to nail this guy although his edits are race related similar to the new one. Keep in touch mate. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Guru Teg Bahadur Ji
Respected sir आप लोगों को गुरू तेग बहादुर जी हिंद की चादर के रूप मे क्यों स्वीकार नहीं । क्या उन्होंने हिन्दू कौम के लिए बलिदान नहीं दिया था थोड़ा सोच का दायरा बढ़ाए कृपया सही इतिहास लिखने में मदद करें । अपनी शवि चमकाने के लिए आप सत्य को छुपा नहीं सकते आप से अनुरोध है कृपया सिख कौम के इतिहास के साथ छेड़छाड़ ना करें। अगर आप सत्य से घबराते हैं तो कृपया सिख इतिहास सम्बंधित कुछ ना लिखे आपकी मेहरबानी होगी। धन्यवाद Gsmalhadia (talk) 08:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , आपको यह समझना होगा कीं, आपको अगर यहां लिखना हैं तो यहां के कायदे कानुनो की‌ दायरें में‌ रहकर जो कुछ भी हो सके वो लिखना होगा. आप कृपया कर के, Please see this WP:RS,  and what you have done on Guru Tegh Bahadur this page is vandalism according to our policies. You can have a look at Tendentious editing So, if you don't want to get blocked please stop doing it, and get to know how you can write here in accordance with policies and guidelines.   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 04:55, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Guru Teg Bahadur
Guru Teg Bahadur "hind di chadar" not shristi di chadar ☚ understood

please dont distroy that teg line it is a humble request once again to all "Wikipedia peer review Team"🙏

Please dont play with wards it is dangerous and shameful thing understood ☚

https://www.quora.com/Sikhism-Why-is-Guru-Teg-Bahadur-known-as-Hind-di-Chaadar

Gsmalhadia (talk) 09:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC) Gsmalhadia (talk) 07:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

, Please provide valid references to your claims. And Don't force your opinions on others, I had suggested you go through the policies before editing anything.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Guru Teg Bahadur
Respected sir आप को सिक्ख इतिहास के खिलाफ गलत लिखने का कोई अधिकार नहीं है इसके तहत कार्रवाई की जा रही है जल्दी ही sgpc इस पर कानूनी कार्रवाई करेगी । ''' केवल आपके कहने से एक गलत बात सत्य नहीं हो सकती। आप सबूत दीजिए कहाँ लिखा है यह Guru Teg Bahadur shrist ki chadar आप अपनी गलत बात लोगों पर थोप रहे हैं Guru Teg Bahadur hind di chadar पूरा विश्व जानता है। यही सत्य है मुझे block करने की धमकी ना दे सत्य प्रताड़ित हो सकता है मिट नहीं सकता।

Proof

https://www.quora.com/Sikhism-Why-is-Guru-Teg-Bahadur-known-as-Hind-di-Chaadar

Gsmalhadia (talk) 11:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

My humble request to Wikipedia peer review team please checked by any third person that person is very dirty mind If i am found wrong in any stage please block me 🙏

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bindumadhav Khire has been accepted
 Bindumadhav Khire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 18:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Bindumadhav_Khire help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

account creator
After reviewing your request for the "accountcreator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things: If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! Katietalk 20:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
 * The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.


 * This user right will expire in six months, at which time you'll need to request it at WP:PERM. Katietalk 20:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, I will use these rights wisely.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 20:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Nakshatra Bagwe
Hi, I would like to know your views about why you felt so it's written like an advertisement or why you think it's not notable enough despite giving several citations? Cheers IndianGlamor (talk) 08:22, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , hi, thanks for your message. You can get to know about references wp:rs here. And about notability wp:gng here. If you didn't understand anything out of these pages, ping me again I will try and make you understand in whichever Indian language you're comfortable with.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 11:34, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , most of your citations doesn't really fit in reliable source guidelines  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 11:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your reply. I will soon start listing the reliable or notable sources as citation. Hope the subject page won't be deleted till then. How long it stays? IndianGlamor (talk) 02:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Yes, and please remove all self-published, affiliated, unreliable references from the article. Importantly those which just mention the subject of the article.
 * See,
 * if it's a news article - The news should be about subject or it should discuss the subject in details, mere mentions doesn't really help.
 * if it's a mention in the book - Same goes there, it should have a sizable mention, discussions.
 * All other sites (mentioned in this article), online material, blogs, facebook are not considered reliable ones.
 * So, Please do that cleaning before you add good references. If you need any help in accessing books/research articles let me know, I can get you those. thanks  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 03:50, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey I've added 4 to 5 notables sources to the articles. How many more you think we need to remove this template? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianGlamor (talk • contribs) 18:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , You havn't removed the unreliable ones. And I am failing to see 4/5 new sources?  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 19:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , I am talking about gaylaxy mag and IMDB, those are not reliable ones, as gaylaxy's editorial functions are unknown and IMDB is just a listing website, it tells this movie existed but not about why a particular movie is important or notable enough.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , You can check WP:RS/IMDB  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

I have added a new reference on number 2 and 3 new citations in external links section they all are focusing completely on the subject at length and are published by DNA, Rediff and so on.

First of all apology for not writing my views here in an expected wiki format, I am trying my best to learn. I'd be removing references like Gaylaxy, tomorrow but I do not agree with your views on IMDb. Yes it's a listing site but they have their own verification process where they see notability of the film and Grant it a page. No matter on what scale it was made or released, they judge the film with citations again. That's why not all films are not on IMDb on this date. So even if according to you it's just a listing site, but I want to mention that this is the most popular international movie listing site that lists the films and grants an artist page after checking the notability hence calling it unreliable isn't realistic. So according to me and a lot others wiki pages of artists IMDb is an important reference. Thank you.


 * * First of all, Its not about what I feel or what you feel, its about what are the policies decided by community here.
 * * Even before I have told you to look at various policies, so WP:RS/IMDB this is one of the policies which was decided by community and not me. So what you feel has no value here, unless hundred of others here thinks the same and say it as a policy.
 * * See, I havn't seen any clear signs of notability in your references till the date, but still I believe that, one fine day you will bring something and I am waiting for that. thanks   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * * See, I havn't seen any clear signs of notability in your references till the date, but still I believe that, one fine day you will bring something and I am waiting for that. thanks   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

If the policy says so then why hundreds of even thousands of other wiki pages still have IMDb as reference? Like you said it's not about what I feel so it same goes for you. I will add some more citations soon and remove those templates that you have applied here on the page and let some other editor decide whether my my references are so called "notable" or not? Because earlier you had mentioned "if it's a news article - The news should be about subject or it should discuss the subject in details, mere mentions doesn't really help." So when I gave you links of mainstream and popular media with authenticity (DNA, Rediff, DC and Asian Age to name a few) you still don't see notability? That's strange.