User talk:Ques4truth

In re SSR
There's a fatal problem with claiming the CBI hasn't confirmed the cause of death: The AIIMS autopsy review was requested by the CBI, so whatever their findings are is basically what the CBI's findings are. And in fact, the CBI (due to the AIIMS review confirming the initial suicide conclusion) are treating this as a suicide. We are under no obligation whatsoever to wait for a court case (and in fact we couldn't cite a court case in this instance anyhow) when multiple credible news sources have reported that (1) the Mumbai cops called it suicide, (2) the AIIMS affirmed the suicide call, and (3) Chakraborty is being accused of abetment of suicide. We're not beholden to peer pressure to violate one of our core content policies for biographical content, especially when the ones pressuring us to do it are pushing conspiracy theories fed by irresponsible media outlets. —A little blue Bori v^_^v  Takes a strong man to deny... 20:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

So are you the one who will decide that it is suicide? Who gave you the authority to decide something that is not proven. All the citations that you mentioned are false propaganda. Are you the Wikipedia owner who decides what is truth based on your judgement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ques4truth (talk • contribs)
 * If you read what Jéské Couriano provided to you, the AIIMS autopsy requested by the CBI, is treating this as suicide. You don't seem to like what you read -- but please know that has no bearing whatsoever as to what is or isn't mentioned in the article regarding this. It will stay as is, and you won't be able to change it. Thank you, —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 06:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)