User talk:Quest14759

Welcome Quest14759! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 42,787,182 registered editors!

Hello Quest14759. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Walter_G%C3%B6rlitz&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Gorillaz into Meanwhile... (Gorillaz EP). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pop Drunk Snot Bread


The article Pop Drunk Snot Bread has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non notable album"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 00:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Thanks for contributing to the article Pop Drunk Snot Bread. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I saw that an article you created, Pop Drunk Snot Bread has not been added to any categories. According to the guideline Categorization, every article should be in at least one category. Please help by adding categories to the articles you create. You can take a look at the categorization FAQ. If you need further help, ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Pop Drunk Snot Bread for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pop Drunk Snot Bread is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pop Drunk Snot Bread until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jax 0677 (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pop Drunk Snot Bread


A tag has been placed on Pop Drunk Snot Bread requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jax 0677 (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Regarding a redirect on the page for the 2023 incarnation of Clone High
Why did you put a redirect to the page for the Clone High reboot? There is no mention of the show being Season 2 on Max (it is considered as a separate show from the OG), sources such as Rotten Tomatoes don't consider this show as S2 of the original and it was produced entirely in the US rather than the original which was co-produced in Canada. Please state your thoughts below. Thanks for understanding.

VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)


 * the creators have said themselves that it is just a second season of the show. i just felt it would be easier to keep it all in one article Quest14759 (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Running Season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Running Season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Running Season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

NOFX
Hey. I'm writing to you, not just because I reverted your changes again, but to say that it's probably better that you discuss on Talk:NOFX why you think their discography page shouldn't be included in their infobox before removing it one more time. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 14:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Please stop wiki-linking to Mega Collider Records on the Third Eye Blind related articles. Links like that don't help the reader when it just redirects to a massive band page that barely even mentions the label. Sergecross73  msg me  00:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Removing discography pages
What's with you removing discography pages at articles such as NOFX, The Offspring, Less Than Jake, Weezer, etc.? Whatever your reason is, please stop it. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * i'm only removing them from the infobox. its not needed there because theres entire sections in those articles dedicated to show their discographies. people can just scroll down there, theres no need for it to be in an infobox Quest14759 (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'm aware that articles of the bands I reverted you at have their own discography sections, but it should be noted that there are tons of other band articles (examples including Rush, Nirvana, Metallica, Slayer, Pantera, Sepultura, Tool, Social Distortion, Bad Religion, etc.) that have their discography page listed in both the infobox and discography section. Does that mean their discography page shouldn't be included in the infobox either? UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * those all werent added until recently. whats with u mentioning other bands? im just saying a link to discographies arent necessary to infoboxes, they should be in their own section. why are you making this a big deal?? Quest14759 (talk) 16:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I was just giving you an example of who else has their discography page in their discography section and infobox. If you think including one to a band's infobox is not necessary, then I think this matter should be discussed at Template talk:Infobox musical artist and not just to me. UndergroundMan3000 (talk) 16:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Literally everything in the infobox is in some other section of the article, that's the entire point of an infobox. If you have a problem with including discographies in the infobox, take it to that template talk page, but edit warring a valid parameter isn't going to prove your point. Darkage7 [Talk] 17:59, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ok Quest14759 (talk) 23:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Missile Toes moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Missile Toes. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sergecross73  msg me  15:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Final warning - next time you add content to Wikipedia without citing a source, your account will be temporarily blocked from editing. See WP:REFB if you need help, but ignoring these warnings and continuing to add unsourced info is not an option. Sergecross73   msg me  16:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I saw your comment here and assumed it was a misplaced response to this discussion? If so, I'm referring to how you kept making unsourced tweaks like this at Trapt, and then, rather than stopping, you did it again here at Bowling for Soup. Sergecross73   msg me  23:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Please carefully read WP:BLP; Dextero and Youtube videos do not qualify as WP:RS for the content you added to Wilbut Soot
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. I highly suggest reading WP:RSP before posting any contentious information in the future. When in doubt, take it to the talk page first. We take WP:BLP very seriously here. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

dont understand how its "disheartening" lmao. yes it is 24 hours and i can wait, but im just confused as to why it was made a big deal to the point where i was blocked? he was a fairly popular figure, and added a source from a publication.
 * Your next block will be much longer if you add that material again after this block expires. OhNo itsJamie Talk 02:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

still no explanation as to what i did was wrong. its public info, you didnt tell me how the source was "unreliable"
 * You were given a very clear warning about BLP, which you violated by replacing one unreliable source with another unreliable source. Further violations of WP:BLP will result in longer blocks. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)