User talk:Questgroups

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Deb (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * You are obviously connected to the company, which means that you have a conflict of interest. According to our WP:COI policy, COI editing is strongly discouraged. That means that you shouldn't be editing about your company at all. I will only unblock you if you:
 * Agree not to write about Quest Groups if unblocked;
 * Tell us what kind of edits you will be making if unblocked.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  08:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Here is a suggestion. Why don't you post here an example of what you will post if you are unblocked? That will give an administrator who reviews your unblock request a much clearer idea of what you expect to do. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.64.166.186 (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Two problems: Firstly, you should not edit while logged out when you are blocked. That is considered block evasion; if necessary we'll block the IP address too. Secondly, it's obvious that your only purpose on Wikipedia is to write about that company; I agree with Vanjagenije that your conflict of interest is too strong for you to write about that subject. Huon (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't realize I was not logged in. I thought since I was able to edit I was logged in, i thought that was how this worked that way you knew who was editing what for security reasons. I am not going to argue over it. If you want to turn on the page with nothing promoting it that's great since it would not be in violation of any actual policies. If not that is fine as well. I thought it would be awesome for people to know about us on a trusted data site like they do for the History channel programs, the non-profits I read about or the pages on corporations like Starbucks that is currently on the site. The pages all had to start somewhere and it was probably with someone that knew the company and about it to get all the facts straight first. This site would not be used for promotional gains it would merely be facts about the company. We Outsource our promotions to linkedin, monster and other sources like that. Please let me know either way. Thanks and I hope you have a great day :)