User talk:Quibu

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quint Buchholz (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quint Buchholz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  19:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quint Buchholz (March 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quint Buchholz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr Strauss  talk  09:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quint Buchholz (April 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quint Buchholz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quint Buchholz (May 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quint Buchholz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quint Buchholz (August 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quint Buchholz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  06:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I saw your request on IRC#wikipedia-en-help for someone to "randomly" review your submission, which you felt had been languishing in the queue for too long. I agree it's too long, you've been working on this for something more than 6 months, it looks like! Anyway, I've tried to give you as explicit instructions on what needs to be done to your submission for it to meet notability standards.


 * You may prefer to read the comments as they appear in the draft rather than the rough-draft version that was posted here. The comment mechanism in the reviewing tool does not offer preview capabilities, so I had to do some fixups after I submitted the review.  &mdash; jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  07:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)