User talk:Quick-hurry-up-slow-down

Welcome!
Hello, Quick-hurry-up-slow-down, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Public art in Barcelona did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Mathglot (talk) 03:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Sourcing, and use of edit summaries
Please read Wikipedia's core policies on WP:Verifiability of article content. Also, use of edit summaries is to be encouraged, but please do not use misleading edit summaries to hide changes of a different nature; your supposed "grammar" change in this change at Amador of Portugal was not a grammar change at all. In fact, it was unsourced changes which altered the meaning in some cases, and was not an improvement. Accordingly, I have undone your edit to this article. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Mathglot (talk) 03:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I've undone your edit at Villa Insurgentes for the same reason. I kept a couple of your clearly beneficial changes, such as capitalization of the town name. There may be other changes in your edit that are worth retaining, but please be sure to follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and use an appropriate edit summary that accurately summarizes your changes. It may be helpful to you, to break up your large edits, into multiple smaller ones; this may make it less likely that another editor will undo your entire change, when it is a mixture of improvements in some areas, and undesirable changes in other areas. Mathglot (talk) 04:07, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

The Lead
I've undone your changes to Coracora, because they were contrary to Wikipedia policy regarding the lead. The WP:LEAD lead of an article is a summary of the body. Generally speaking, you should not change the lead of the article unless it is to make it a better summary of already existing sourced content in the body. Put another way, according to WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY, you should make changes to the body of the article first, making sure the changes are well sourced with citations to reliable sources, and only after that is complete, should you consider changing the WP:LEAD. As a general rule, as a brand new editor, you should not be making any changes at all to the lead. Please make sure you understand Wikipedia's core principle of WP:Verifiability. You may wish to go through the Tutorial to learn more about editing at Wikipedia. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 04:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)