User talk:Quickstar7

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Shot info (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I am not a paid employee of Quixtar and I do not appreciated your false claims and removing my comments from a *talk* area. --Insider201283 (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You said - "NO one said you were paid by Quixtar. You are compensated by Quixtar "groups". That is a fact."
 * That is a complete and utter lie. --Insider201283 (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not attempt to censor other users' comments from Talk pages. Only blatant vandalism or personal attacks should be considered for removal - if you have a concern about another user's possible conflict of interest, note your concern by replying to the message, not deleting it. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

BWW/Skaggs case
if you have access to other court documents, please email them to me (ibofightback@ttaa.biz) and I'll convert if necessary and load them up on amwaywiki. --Insider201283 (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Quixtar
Please don't post source material in Wikipedia articles. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Bill Britt
Please remember Wikiepedia is an encyclopedia and entries should be made in that spirit. You may want to review Tutorial_(Keep_in_mind) --Insider201283 (talk) 21:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You have re-added the claims to Bill Britt. Please note that only reliable sources (not wikis) can be used for claims in articles and that we have to be especially careful about living people. This is an ongoing civil case and I cannot see any reason for it to be even mentioned in the article unless there is a lot of press interest. Note that I cannot see such press interest and adding this gives the case undue weight - Peripitus (Talk) 02:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Have you considered writing on the article's talk page, on my page or anywhere but simply reverting all edits that are not yours? www.amwaywiki is wiki that states The information on this site may or may not be accurate. and is a completely inappropriate source for a biography of a living person, or any article - Peripitus (Talk) 20:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you need your account blocked from editing before you stop ? You cannot, without exceptions, post allegations like you have to articles on living people. You do not seem to be here for the benefit of the encyclopedia and clearly have not read and understood the neutral point-of-view required here. Try talking first then changing the article when you have consensus that your edit is correct ? - 21:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Mar 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at talk:Bill Britt, you will be blocked from editing. Shot info (talk) 01:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Talk:Bill Britt. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

You have been reported to the Admin Noticeboard here. Shot info (talk) 02:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Your edits
Hi Quickstar,

This edit removed a large amount of commentary from a talk page. Please do not do that (scroll down if it's not obvious in the first screen-full). Additionally, this edit is bullying, and this edit is user page vandalism. Perhaps you meant to post it on Shot's talk page. In any case, I suggest you modify your behavior if you wish to edit here; have a look at our our civility policy, and be advised that talk pages are for discussion of ways to improve their corresponding article, not for posting press releases, personal commentary, or soapboxing. Everything added to an article must be sourced to reliable sources (a wiki -- any wiki, whether ours or someone else's -- is not a reliable source, by our community-defined standard). Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)