User talk:Quidgest

COI and username
Hello! I left you the welcome box above. I'm glad you found how to edit articles, and do some of the many functions on Wikipedia (I saw you wrote an article on your userpage and moved it to the mainspace). However, the article you wrote has no references in it. For an article to remain on Wikipedia, we have certain criteria, it has to be sourced with reliable, third party coverage. This coverage has to be somewhat in depth to, and not just a trivial mention. If the article isn't sourced soon, it could be deleted through one of the many deletion processes.

Additionally, per our rules on usernames, I'd suggest that you change usernames. If you'd like to keep your work on Wikipedia attributed to you, you can change usernames (all your contributions will be transferred to the new username) or you can just leave this username and sign up for a new one. Please get back to me about the username situation because usernames that have ties to products/companies/etc. tend to be blocked from editing.

Furthermore (sorry this is so long) you might wanna read up on WP:COI since you have a conflict of interest with the article you just created (evidenced by your username). Killiondude (talk) 17:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Logo Quidgest 02.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Quidgest 02.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Quidgest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quidgest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quidgest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Küñall (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Quidgest 02.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Quidgest 02.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

November 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Generative artificial intelligence. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Secretlondon (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)