User talk:Quietlygrateful

Nomination of Lester W Lambert for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lester W Lambert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lester W Lambert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Y intan  16:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
You are obviously User:Thebitsyboutique. If you wish to be unblocked, please log into that account and request an unblock at User talk:Thebitsyboutique. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Who is User:Thebitsyboutique? Anna Frodesiak I am a financial contributor to Wikipedia and thought that individual was Notable and should not have been deleted.Quietlygrateful (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The reason you should stop
You should definitely stop.

Hi Thebitsyboutique aka Quietlygrateful aka User:Lester Wesley Lambert. You are obviously lying.

Here is why you should stop promoting with a Lambert article:

This is all public, searchable, and undeletable.

This includes the page Articles for deletion/Wesley Lambert with the edits by your other accounts User:DarrylOwens and User:NormaMarkam where you pretended to be someone else and lied.

Frankly, the fact that you have abused Wikipedia, lied, deceived, and shamelessly promoted is embarrassing.

Also, as an entrepreneur, eCommerce specialist, former restaurateur, and current CFO, this makes the Lambert brand appear completely dishonest. This cannot be good.

You are here to promote and have the prestige of a Lambert article, but what is written here is now, and permanently, having the opposite effect.

Just stop.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)