User talk:QuintiliansRebuke

Curious Pastimes
In this edit to Curious Pastimes, you added several links, labelling them "Objection to deletion". Unfortunately they're completely irrelevant to the claim of lack of notability. The link to the Wikipedia article on LARPing is a good addition, but does nothing to establish the notability of CP. (I've fixed the link to be a proper Wikipedia internal link instead of an external link.) Similarly, there is no reason to link to th Lorien Trust web site from this article, I changed it to point to LT's Wikipedia article. Finally, the link to Curious Pastimes' home page is really just an external link, not a citation. If you'd like your article to survive the non-notability challenge, you need to meet the guidelines at Notability (organizations and companies). To summarize the guidelines: cite a few third-party sources who provide non-trivial coverage of CP. A single source might be enough if it's really in depth and from an obviously reliable source (say, any major newspaper). Note that announcements of events is trivial coverage won't cut it. I wish you the best of luck. — Alan De Smet | Talk 17:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)