User talk:Quintonshark8713

Welcome, roadfan!
Hello, Quintonshark8713, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me! If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC. Again, welcome! Rschen7754 04:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Interstate 610 (Texas) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=672362035 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F672362035%7CInterstate 610 (Texas)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Ghostbusters
Hi, I removed your addition of Sony Pictures Animation for Ghostbusters (2016 film) because all the sources I found online states that Sony is planning another film which can be animated after the release of their 2016 female version. So Sony Pictures Animation is definitely not part of 2016 film. If I am mistaken or you have a better source for the addition of Sony Pictures Animation as studio for this 2016 film please add the information again with the source. If you want to talk to me about this matter, you can leave me a message on talk page. Regards--Jockzain (talk) 19:41, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes they have completely animated or Live-Action/Animated film in work but that film is not this 2016 female version of Ghostbusters, it is another separate film. So we can not add Sony Pictures Animation for this film.--Jockzain (talk) 11:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Columbia Pictures films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Misrepresenting sources
In, you cited Variety Insight to say that RatPac-Dune and Lord Miller Productions are producing The Lego Ninjago Movie. However, the source does not say this. Please do not misrepresent sources like this. Per this discussion, production companies require proper sourcing to prevent original research. If you have trouble with this, feel free to ask for help at WikiProject Film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Paramount Pictures films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Paramount Pictures films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. One entry was completely unsourced, and the other was cited to a source that said nothing about Paramount Pictures or the other production companies mentioned in your edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding unsourced and poorly-sourced information about production companies. I just revert an edit where you .  A press release is not a reliable source.  A reliable source is one written by a professional journalist in a publication that has a history of fact checking and editorial control.  Press releases are promotional material that are generally self-published, and anyone can say anything in a press release.  There's no fact checking.  Furthermore, per this consensus, production companies should be cited to a reliable secondary source that explicitly states that they are a production company, not to primary sources, such as trailers, posters, press releases, etc.  If you have having trouble with this, please seek assistance at WikiProject, the tea house, or perhaps on my talk page, where I can help you.  If you continue like this, you are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  You seem very keen to make articles say what you believe to be true; however, Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources say, not what we believe to be true.  This means that you will sometimes have to avoid adding content to Wikipedia until you can find a sufficiently reliable source – not promotional material or primary sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Warner Bros. films. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:11, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.

Please feel free to communicate with me here. All we want to know is that you will provide sources when making those additions. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 2018 in film. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Village Roadshow and The 15:17 to Paris
First of all, press releases are generally not reliable sources. Second, the press release that you've been adding doesn't say anything about Village Roadshow being a production company; it just says that they will handle distribution "in some territories". Please stop adding poorly-sourced production companies to film articles. See this consensus that production companies should be explicitly named as such in an independent, secondary reliable source. That would preclude posters, trailers, press releases, and other promotional material. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2002 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scholastic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2002_in_film check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2002_in_film?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)