User talk:Quisp65

January 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You have a long history of making racially tinged edits and comments here, but what you were doing on Nathan Phillips (activist) was simply a falsification of the source, and given the racial context of many of your edits, I have reason enough to believe that you are indeed not here to improve our beautiful project., please see what you think about all this and correct me if I'm wrong. Drmies (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Quisp65


A tag has been placed on User:Quisp65 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"the user page is patent nonsense enough, but it G1 is not applicable in userspace"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sheldybett (talk) 08:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)