User talk:QuiteCurious/sandbox

Peer Review
Good job with finding sources for the Bibliography and adding to it. I also agree with removing the "Contemporary Romance Novels" heading because none of the other books genres covered in the old Bibliography have their genre specified in the listing. Also, the Awards section is a needed and nice addition that helps support notability. Also, good job at removing bias from the Biography section.

One suggestion I have is possibly adding the note about Iris Johansen having seventeen consecutive NY Times bestsellers into the awards section or rephrase it into the "Lead" section at the beginning of the page to emphasize her relevance at a glance.

I think the most important thing you can do to improve the article at this point, barring the work you've already done, is to flesh out the biography a little bit more. As it stands right now it's a little sparse, but in the old biography there's a mention of her children, birthplace, and current residence. If you could find a source for those things, then I think they'd help flesh it out a lot. Do we know if she attended a certain college for writing or English?

Looking over your article it helped put parts of my own article into perspective. Good job, and good luck! Sorenss (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review
Seems like you've added a lot of works and other references of Iris Johansen! I think (if you are not already working on this) you should link as many of those titles as you can.

For someone who is unfamiliar with this author I think it would be helpful to add some more basic background information. I agree with the previous commentator that using some of the work from the original page would help with this background.

Maybe play with organization a little bit more.

Overall, good work with adding content. Mwillmer (talk) 21:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)