User talk:Quovi/Mangrove crab

Test for training model question Caffeinatedmicrobe (talk) 16:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * my review of what's present in the article
 * Lead: Doesn't give a summary of the article just is a short paragraph about the crabs.
 * Content: There is a lot of detail missing from the page and it feels quite general.
 * Tone: feels a bit informal but is otherwise neutral.
 * Sources: the sources seem good but the article is just lacking the full range of information found in the sources.
 * Organization: there are not enough sections as the page is brief.
 * Talk page: the only thing on the page is what I added it was rated low and needs work.
 * Overall: what is present is good work but it doesn't capture the full extent of the topic and needs many more sources and topics included in the article. Caffeinatedmicrobe (talk) 16:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
Just completed a peer review. Looks pretty good! Such0051 (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)