User talk:Qweasdzxc11

Welcome!
Hello, Qweasdzxc11, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Dennis Bradley, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello Qweasdzxc11. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Dennis Bradley, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Qweasdzxc11. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Given that you are holding yourself out as the photographer of the image used on Bradley's web page, it is reasonable to assume you are a staffer of some variety. —C.Fred (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

''There must be a misunderstanding as I am not a staffer nor being compensated - I chose the picture as it was the one available on the ct.gov website. If the picture is owned by the taxpayer, therefore I thought it was the right way to upload. Is there a better way to submit images to avoid this confusion?''


 * You held yourself out as the photographer. We need to be clear who owns the rights at that they are freely available. Do you have the link to the page on ct.gov where you found it? —C.Fred (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I found http://senatedems.ct.gov/bradley-news/2129-bradley-190205#sthash.mRzqwjxb.dpbs and confirm that copyright was infringed. —C.Fred (talk) 03:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

hank you for the clarification, that was definitely a mistake on my part. Here is the URL for the image on the CT.gov website: http://www.senatedems.ct.gov/templates/Bradley/images/Bradley1x1.jpg. Thank you for your help reviewing this. If the picture is copyrighted, perhaps removing it entirely is the best route?

GA icon on Dennis Bradley
Hello! I'm Lafayette Baguette. I noticed that upon creation of the page Dennis Bradley, you added a good article icon. The article, however, was not reviewed for a GA and does not meet the GA criteria. I'm questioning now why you did so. Regards, Lafayette  Baguette   talk   03:59, 7 April 2019 (UTC)