User talk:Qwertasdfgzx

Quinton Jackson
Please don't add copyrighted material into Wikipedia verbatim. For legal reasons, we can't accept such text - you can use MMA Weekly as a reference, but not as a source for prose. east718 //  talk  //  email  // 05:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

James Irvin (fighter)
According to Sherdog the result of the Houston Alexander fight was a KO due to a superman punch. If you want to change it to a TKO due to punches, you need to have a reference that backs that up. Otherwise it should probably be changed back. -- jhan  CRUSH  05:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I took care of it and referenced the living daylights out of both James Irvin and Houston Alexander. -- jhan  CRUSH  20:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Good job. Thanks. --Qwertasdfgzx (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

"Edit war"
I've responded to your comments at User_talk:East718. Thx. Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Chuck Liddell
If you don't feel that Dana White is a good enough source, then you should take the time to revise the section in his biography about retirement as well. If he's not retired, then he shouldn't have a section entitled retirement in his bio. Tslims99 (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The reason I don't consider Dana White a good source is because he has proven time and time again that he is a liar and also Chuck Liddell has said he is NOT retired. I tend to believe the athlete rather than the promoter.


 * You do make a good point. I'll change that heading to "Rumored Retirement".Qwertasdfgzx (talk) 22:04, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Edwin D. Cruz
Yeah, seems to be all BS. I've reverted all his edits and requested the article he created for deletion. Really have to wonder why people bothers sometimes... Good job noticing it in any case :) -- aktsu (t / c) 04:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)